WireMock.Net
Refit
WireMock.Net | Refit | |
---|---|---|
9 | 33 | |
1,315 | 8,126 | |
3.3% | 1.6% | |
8.4 | 8.2 | |
5 days ago | 10 days ago | |
C# | C# | |
Apache License 2.0 | MIT License |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
WireMock.Net
-
Mock heavy tests
I'd say that without wanting to refactor the code a little bit (maybe moving those HttpClients into a service so that they are easily mocked) your best bet would be to use something like WireMock or MockHttp.
-
Please recommend a good API Mocking tool
WireMock
-
Usefully links for DotNet Backend Developers
WiremockNet https://github.com/WireMock-Net/WireMock.Net
-
Integration tests without API dependencies with ASP.NET Core and WireMock.Net
In this post, I'll explain how to create mocks for HTTP APIs in narrow integration tests using the WireMock.Net library.
-
Fake apis for testing
Recently was pointed to WireMock for testing purposes.
-
How do you Unit Test a WebAPI? What do you test?
I use WireMock (@ Java) to start a local webserver alongside the tests, this webserver will provide ‘real’ responses to the client. Here’s the C# equivalent: https://github.com/WireMock-Net/WireMock.Net
- Capturing Http requests for testing purposes
-
How do I mock the response from my authentication server for client integration tests?
You could try out WireMock.Net: https://github.com/WireMock-Net/WireMock.Net/wiki/Using-WireMock-in-UnitTests
-
The only way to go fast, is to go well (TDD from Factorio)
Use WireMock to mock responses from the endpoint that FooClient interacts with. This lets you exercise all of the code contained in FooClient in a realistic way, without using mocks, but still get the different responses you expect.
Refit
-
Exception Handling in C# Methods returning object
A lot of people have given you good replies, but have you looked at Refit?
-
Http calls on mobile, what is the preferred way / best practice
Another question that rises is, would it be better to use some HttpClient package to handle the requests, like Refit in combination with Polly. But then again, it seems Refit also uses the HttpClient factory, which was a bad thing according to the previous?
-
Refactor your dotNET HTTP Clients to Typed HTTP Clients
Define a Refit client interface with the following for each API endpoint, e.g. GET /foo:
-
HttpClient best approach
Use RestEase to create your own client library. Refit is a very similar and more popular library. IMO RestEase is an improvement over Refit and I prefer it, but either will solve your problems. Both are libs that have you build interfaces describing the API endpoints, then the library handles all the boilerplate code that calls HttpClient.
-
What your hidden nuget gems ?
Refit - simple, typed REST clients: https://github.com/reactiveui/refit
-
how to structure code for rest api calls
I'd advise using this https://github.com/reactiveui/refit tool for HTTP requests. It saves a lot of time for serialization, deserialization and exception handling.
-
Roadmap for transition from Java
Use Refit, and let manage the live of HttpClient. Also, Refit will give you a strongly typed client around an API. All you have to write is the interface. Ain't that neat ? If you can't, use the HttpClientFactory to create the HttpClient instance: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/architecture/microservices/implement-resilient-applications/use-httpclientfactory-to-implement-resilient-http-requests
-
ASP.NET Core - how to properly make a GET request?
Use RestEase to create your own client library. Refit is a very similar and more popular library. IMO RestEase is an improvement over Refit and I prefer it, but either will solve your problems. Both are libs that have you build interfaces describing the API endpoints, then the library handles all the boilerplate code that calls HttpClient.
-
Integration tests without API dependencies with ASP.NET Core and WireMock.Net
The controller is simple and use the Refit library to abstract the PokéAPI call and then, returns the data.
-
I love refit
To be fair, Refit is pretty great.
What are some alternatives?
Moq - Repo for managing Moq 4.x [Moved to: https://github.com/moq/moq]
RestSharp - Simple REST and HTTP API Client for .NET
mockhttp - Testing layer for Microsoft's HttpClient library. Create canned responses using a fluent API.
Flurl.Http - Fluent URL builder and testable HTTP client for .NET
SpecFlow - #1 .NET BDD Framework. SpecFlow automates your testing & works with your existing code. Find Bugs before they happen. Behavior Driven Development helps developers, testers, and business representatives to get a better understanding of their collaboration
RestEase - Easy-to-use typesafe REST API client library for .NET Standard 1.1 and .NET Framework 4.5 and higher, which is simple and customisable. Inspired by Refit
xUnit - xUnit.net is a free, open source, community-focused unit testing tool for .NET.
NSwag - The Swagger/OpenAPI toolchain for .NET, ASP.NET Core and TypeScript.
Fluent Assertions - A very extensive set of extension methods that allow you to more naturally specify the expected outcome of a TDD or BDD-style unit tests. Targets .NET Framework 4.7, as well as .NET Core 2.1, .NET Core 3.0, .NET 6, .NET Standard 2.0 and 2.1. Supports the unit test frameworks MSTest2, NUnit3, XUnit2, MSpec, and NSpec3.
Simple.OData.Client
dotnet-testcontainers - 🐋 A library to support tests with throwaway instances of Docker containers for all compatible .NET Standard versions. [Moved to: https://github.com/testcontainers/testcontainers-dotnet]
Ocelot - .NET API Gateway