Ocelot
wt-tracker
Ocelot | wt-tracker | |
---|---|---|
3 | 3 | |
392 | 237 | |
- | 3.4% | |
0.0 | 7.8 | |
over 8 years ago | 29 days ago | |
C++ | TypeScript | |
GNU General Public License v3.0 or later | Apache License 2.0 |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
Ocelot
-
whats the most common software and method for installation for torrent trackers.
And of course the current private tracker king: https://github.com/WhatCD/Ocelot
-
aquatic_ws (WebTorrent tracker) rewritten with glommio, achieves up to 1.6 million responses a second in load tests
https://github.com/WhatCD/Ocelot might be interesting to benchmark against as tracker software that is widely used. I believe it's single-threaded (but async) C. It might not be the simplest to setup though.
-
What are good sources to use for a private tracker site?
The best software pair is Oppaitime Gazelle and What.cd Ocelot with the "mixtape" patches.
wt-tracker
-
aquatic_ws (WebTorrent tracker) rewritten with glommio, achieves up to 1.6 million responses a second in load tests
wt-tracker (nodejs, single-threaded) reached 31 thousand responses a second
-
aquatic: extremely performant open BitTorrent tracker software (UDP, HTTP, WebTorrent)
aquatic_http is a BitTorrent over HTTP over TLS tracker and aquatic_ws is a WebTorrent over TLS tracker. I don't have full current benchmarks comparing them to other options, but in a previous one, aquatic_ws handily outperformed both wt-tracker and bittorrent-tracker.
-
aquatic BitTorrent tracker: WebTorrent support (1.8M responses/second); new UDP benchmarks (650k rps)
I did some benchmarks with my load testing tool and got very encouraging results: 1.8M tracker responses per second when using 14 threads, compared to a maximum of 117k responses per second for closest competitor wt-tracker. I suspect that the openwebtorrent tracker would be a lot closer in performance to aquatic, but since it only runs over TLS, I couldn’t test it, as the load tester doesn’t support it. More info on the benchmark (PDF).
What are some alternatives?
Gazelle
p2p-media-loader - An open-source engine for P2P streaming of live and on demand video directly in a web browser HTML page
gazelle - BioTorrents.de’s version of Gazelle
alttp-tracker - A mobile app for tracking ALTTP randomizer runs.
openwebtorrent-tracker - Fast and simple Webtorrent tracker implementation in C++
torrust-index - This repository serves as the backend for the Torrust Index project.
Torrent-Tracker-Platforms - A Curated List Of Torrent Tracker Platforms/Codebases Written In Multiple Coding Languages
udp-socket - Advanced udp socket.
aquatic - High-performance open BitTorrent tracker (UDP, HTTP, WebTorrent)
announcement - Serving P2P biology data on Debian 9 with BitTorrent
webtorrent-mpv-hook - Adds a hook that allows mpv to stream torrents