Trilinos
MatX
Trilinos | MatX | |
---|---|---|
2 | 7 | |
1,156 | 1,117 | |
0.9% | 1.2% | |
9.9 | 9.1 | |
4 days ago | 4 days ago | |
C++ | C++ | |
GNU General Public License v3.0 or later | BSD 3-clause "New" or "Revised" License |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
Trilinos
-
Software component names should be whimsical and cryptic
If you want to see this line of thinking taken a bit too far, check out the list of Trilinos packages on github: https://github.com/trilinos/Trilinos/tree/master/packages
It definitely makes things much less accessible to a newcomer / outsider.
(Trilinos is a set of scientific / engineering libraries for HPC)
-
C++ for scientific programming?
It can be the base of whatever *you* write via bindings generators like pybind11. In that sense, the answer to your question is "however you like". For actual simulation code, you'll see a lot more legacy Fortran and C. That said, with things like mdspan maybe being standardized (proposal), efforts towards a standard linear algebra library, and the existence of ubiquitous HPC frameworks already having been written in C++, I would say it's only a matter of time before C++ accounts for an even bigger share of all HPC code.
MatX
- An efficient C++17 GPU numerical computing library with Python-like syntax
-
MatX: Efficient C++17 GPU numerical computing library with Python-like syntax
Hi, what specifically are you looking to benchmark on the K80? Users are free to contribute and we've had many external PRs.
Contribution guide is here: https://github.com/NVIDIA/MatX/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md
-
Blaze: High Performance Mathematics In C++
For GPU support take a look at our library:
https://github.com/NVIDIA/MatX
If anything is missing we're happy to take feature requests.
- C++ for scientific programming?
What are some alternatives?
FFTW - DO NOT CHECK OUT THESE FILES FROM GITHUB UNLESS YOU KNOW WHAT YOU ARE DOING. (See below.)
ParallelReductionsBenchmark - Thrust, CUB, TBB, AVX2, CUDA, OpenCL, OpenMP, SyCL - all it takes to sum a lot of numbers fast!
GSL - GNU Scientific Library with CMake build support and AMPL bindings
GPU-accelerated-guppy-basecalling - GPU-accelerated guppy basecalling and demultiplexing on Linux
Blitz++ - Git mirror of Blitz++ at http://sourceforge.net/projects/blitz/
cuda_memtest - Fork of CUDA GPU memtest :eyeglasses:
Kratos - Kratos Multiphysics (A.K.A Kratos) is a framework for building parallel multi-disciplinary simulation software. Modularity, extensibility and HPC are the main objectives. Kratos has BSD license and is written in C++ with extensive Python interface.
ginkgo - Numerical linear algebra software package
HELICS - Hierarchical Engine for Large-scale Infrastructure Co-Simulation (HELICS)
conan - Conan - The open-source C and C++ package manager
Torch - http://torch.ch
conan-center-index - Recipes for the ConanCenter repository