ThreadPool VS CppCoreGuidelines

And in C++ can also use this dead-simple header file for a nice high-level, modern threadpool using function objects (lambdas) for very easy parallelization of arbitrary tasks: https://github.com/progschj/ThreadPool

Depending on how sophisticated you are with C++ you might want to try to impress him by using multithreading. I like this simple library. It's only like a 100 lines of code in a single header, and it is very simple to use.

#!/usr/bin/env bash if [ ! -d kenlm ]; then git clone https://github.com/kpu/kenlm.git echo -e "\n" fi if [ ! -d openfst-1.6.3 ]; then echo "Download and extract openfst ..." wget http://www.openfst.org/twiki/pub/FST/FstDownload/openfst-1.6.3.tar.gz tar -xzvf openfst-1.6.3.tar.gz echo -e "\n" fi if [ ! -d ThreadPool ]; then git clone https://github.com/progschj/ThreadPool.git echo -e "\n" fi echo "Install decoders ..." python setup.py install --num_processes 4

For point 2, just use this if you're lazy: https://github.com/progschj/ThreadPool

If you aren't aware of the c++ core guidelines[1] - it should be on your radar.

Also, it might not be a popular opinion, but I think Bjarne's books are just fine.

A Tour of C++ (3rd edition) [2]

Principles and Practice Using C++ (3rd Edition) was just published in april 2023 [3]

[1] https://github.com/isocpp/CppCoreGuidelines/blob/master/CppC...

You need to talk to Bjarne and Herb...

"C++ Core Guidelines" - https://isocpp.github.io/CppCoreGuidelines/CppCoreGuidelines

In addition to the other comments -

TypeScript deliberately takes a "good enough" approach to improving JavaScript, instead of designing an ideal but incompatible approach. For example, its handling of [function parameter bivariance](https://www.typescriptlang.org/docs/handbook/type-compatibil...) is unsound but works much better with the existing JavaScript ecosystem. By contrast, a more academic functional programming language would guarantee a sound type system but would be a huge shift from JavaScript.

By analogy, Herb Sutter is arguing that something like the [C++ Core Guidelines](https://isocpp.github.io/CppCoreGuidelines/CppCoreGuidelines), with tooling help in this new Cpp2 syntax, can bring real improvements to safety. Something like Rust's borrow checker would bring much stricter guarantees, backed by academic research and careful design, but would be incompatible and a huge adjustment.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2olsGf6JIkU

Take a look at Effective Modern c++ by Scott Meyers and the ISO c++ core guidelines. These resources are great for learning how to write better, more modern C++. I don't think it would be hard to grasp if you're already familiar with the language, just make sure to actually write some code which makes use of this stuff, otherwise it's easy to forget.

Look to the C++ Core Guidelines. It's not perfect, it has some flaws, including some sabotaging advice apparently adopted for political reasons. But at least it has some C++ authorities (Bjarne and Herb) as authors.