SuperAGI VS gradio

Repo : https://github.com/TransformerOptimus/SuperAGI

The recent introduction of the “Agent Summary” feature in SuperAGI version 0.0.10 has brought a drastic difference in agent performance – improving the quality of agent output. Agent Summary helps AI agents maintain a larger context about their goals while executing complex tasks that require longer conversations (iterations).

Checkout the full release here: https://github.com/TransformerOptimus/SuperAGI/releases/tag/v0.0.10

10. SuperAGI

Currently, PaLM2 Bison is live on the dev branch of SuperAGI GitHub for the community to try: https://github.com/TransformerOptimus/SuperAGI/tree/dev

SuperAGI is made with developers in mind, therefore it takes into account their requirements and preferences when making autonomous AI agents. It has a number of advantages, including:

I think for agents to truly find adoption in real world, agent trajectory fine tuning is critical component - how do you make an agent perform better to achieve particular objective with every subsequent run. Basically making the agents learn similar to how we learn when we

Also I think current LLMs might not fit well for agent use cases in mid to long term because the RL they go through is based on input-best output methods whereas the intelligence that you need in agents is more around how to build an algorithm to achieve an objective on the fly - this requires perhaps new type of large models ( Large Agent Models ? ) which are trained using RLfD ( Reinforcement Learning from demonstration )

Also I think one of the key missing piece is a highly configurable software middle ware between Intelligence ( LLMs ), Memory ( Vector Dbs ~LTMs, STMs ), Tools and workflows across every iteration. Current agent core loop to find next best action is too simplistic. For example if core self prompting loop or iteration of an agent can be configured for the use case in hand. Eg for BabyAGI, every iteration goes through workflow of Plan, Prioritize and Execute or in AutoGPT it finds the next best action based on LTM/STM, or GPTEngineer it is to write specs > write tests > write code. Now for dev infra monitoring agent this workflow might be totally different - it would look like consume logs from different tools like Grafana, Splunk, APMs > See if it doesnt have an anomaly > if it has an anomaly then take human input for feedback. Every use case in real world has it's own workflow and current construct of agent frameworks have this thing hard coded in base prompt. In SuperAGI( https://superagi.com) ( disclaimer : Im creator of it ), core iteration workflow of agent can be defined as part of agent provisioning.

Another missing piece is notion of Knowledge. Agents currently depend entirely upon knowledge of LLMs or search results to execute on tasks, but if a specialised knowledge set is plugged to an agent, it performs significantly better.

Build your own game here: https://github.com/TransformerOptimus/SuperAGI

gradio is a package developed to ease the development of app interfaces in python and other languages (GitHub)

There's also that library all the AI models started using that gives you a public URL to share. After researching it: https://www.gradio.app/ is the link.

It's used specifically for making simple UIs for machine learning apps. But I guess technically you could use it for anything.

What is the business model for https://www.taipy.io/, https://streamlit.io/, or https://www.gradio.app/? These are nice tools - but how will the sponsoring businesses support themselves? I didn't see any mention of enterprise plans, etc. Is the answer simply that "we've not announced our revenue model yet"? What should one expect?

Repo : https://github.com/gradio-app/gradio

There's TensorFlow.js for running machine learning on JavaScript, but personally, I'd prefer using the Python Gradio package, which is designed for creating UIs for machine learning inference demos.

I found an issue on gradio github but looks like it's closed so I am not sure if it's still a common issue or only I am facing it due to certain settings/absence of a fix. ( https://github.com/gradio-app/gradio/issues/3060 )

I disagree hard with this – for instance I've recently needed to dig into the code for the Gradio library, and when PRs are like https://github.com/gradio-app/gradio/pull/3300 (and the merge commit's message is what it is) it's hard to understand why some decisions have been made when doing `git annotate` later on.

Gradio for a ui that your commanderGPT can visit and use

gradio is documented, it doesn't seem very complex, it would be something like moving this block under the other one. i think it's ui_extra_networks.py, the file you are looking to edit. (if you do it make a copy to restore when you go to update)

Gradio did have an issue for a while where your URL was guessable, so unless you had a password it was pretty easy to find, but as far as I know they've increased the complexity so much that it's no longer an issue.