StackExchange Redis VS scratch-www

Yet their high performing custom redis client code or Dapper is as clean as could be.

The best practices for using the Redis client StackExchange.Redis

To connect Redis from .NET Required Some sort of DB Driver & ORM. StackExchange Redis is popular amongst .NET Developers to connect Redis instances. But for easy use of Redis search & Redis JSON features, we will use Redis OM. NET.

The code which produces the error is from a plugin I've added to my project called StackExchange.Redis. https://github.com/StackExchange/StackExchange.Redis Said plugin has a ref struct called BufferReader https://github.com/StackExchange/St.../main/src/StackExchange.Redis/BufferReader.cs

StackExchange.Redis offers support for C# (and should work fine with most .NET languages; VB, F#, etc)

https://github.com/StackExchange/StackExchange.Redis/issues/1279 is an example... We had people storing big json docs which blocks the "multiplexer" and needed a pool. Fine, but the docs indicated you only need one. StackExchange.Redis.Extensions fixes a lot of the problems, but it's not from stack exchange and they don't support it.

For example in C# the Nuget package StackExchange.Redis has a configuration object that must register the Twemproxy server to work correctly. The only difference between using this package directly against Memorystore and indirectly through Twemproxy is the Proxy property of the ConfigurationOptions object. The API for setting and retrieving data from the cache remains the same.

LiveCode is about the closest literal logical successor to HyperCard.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LiveCode?wprov=sfti1

That said, I think Scratch is a better learning environment these days and you can develop workable apps in the style of HyperCard. There are plenty of tutorials, documentation, and examples to work from.

https://scratch.mit.edu

and https://codecombat.com, which has been around for a while now.

I think this paradigm (navigating a character using "move" function invocations) is good but kind of exhausts its usefulness after a while. I question whether my daughter learns coding this way or just is playing a turn based top down platformer. The most code like thing is when you use 'loops' to have characters repeat sequences of moves. I think when kids grok these things these apps become just types of glofiried education flavoured video games. There are a lot of things in kodable for instance that I feel are just basic web games with coding terms slapped on it.

https://scratch.mit.edu/ is more like 'programming' imo, even at the level of the objective -- having a blank canvas to create something. It seems a little advanced for my kids right now though.

+1 Scratch! My son started with it, then expanded into Roblox/Lua.

Children can download other people's games and experiment there. Scratch also has pre-made art, sounds, music.

https://scratch.mit.edu/

Scratch.mit.edu is a highly-recommended place to start [1] https://scratch.mit.edu/

> Scratch is the world’s largest coding community for children and a coding language with a simple visual interface that allows young people to create digital stories, games, and animations. Scratch is designed, developed, and moderated by the Scratch Foundation, a nonprofit organization. [2]

1: https://scratch.mit.edu/

https://scratch.mit.edu/ (Scratch version 2)

Someone who uses scratch.mit.edu (like me)

Now that I think of it, I did start game development on scratch before going right into java (because of minecraft).