SpeedTests
DaemonMode.jl
SpeedTests | DaemonMode.jl | |
---|---|---|
4 | 22 | |
62 | 269 | |
- | - | |
7.5 | 4.7 | |
2 months ago | 5 months ago | |
Python | Julia | |
MIT License | MIT License |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
SpeedTests
- SpeedTests: Comparing the execution speeds of various programming languages
-
Compile for faster execution?
Thanks. Maybe somebody could look at my program why it's so slow. I have a project in which I benchmark several languages for the same problem. I added Julia (link) but I expected it to be faster. The source code is here.
- SpeedTests: Comparing Execution Speeds of Various Programming Languages
DaemonMode.jl
-
Potential of the Julia programming language for high energy physics computing
Thats for an entry point, you can search `Base.@main` to see a little summary of it. Later it will be able to be callable with `juliax` and `juliac` i.e. `~juliax test.jl` in shell.
DynamicalSystems looks like a heavy project. I don't think you can do much more on your own. There have been recent features in 1.10 that lets you just use the portion you need (just a weak dependency), and there is precompiletools.jl but these are on your side.
You can also look into https://github.com/dmolina/DaemonMode.jl for running a Julia process in the background and do your stuff in the shell without startup time until the standalone binaries are there.
-
Julia 1.9.0 lives up to its promise
> If I were to use e.g. Rust with polars, load time would be virtually none.
Because you're compiling...
And if you need to do the same in Julia, you should also pre-compile or some other method like https://github.com/dmolina/DaemonMode.jl (their demo shows loading a database, with subsequent loads after the first one taking roughly ~0.2% of the first)
- Administrative Scripting with Julia
- GNU Octave 8.1
-
Ask HN: Why is Julia so underrated?
Well, not nicely certainly, but:
https://github.com/dmolina/DaemonMode.jl
> portable
Neither is python - it just relies on universal availability. Over timeā¦
-
Is Julia suitable today as a scripting language?
You can get around a lot of these problems with DaemonMode.jl though.
-
Julia performance, startup.jl, and sysimages
You might want DaemonMode.jl
-
Can I execute code in Julia REPL if I'm connected to a remote server?
https://github.com/dmolina/DaemonMode.jl can possibly help in the future. Leaving it here so that people know this is planned.
- Ask HN: Why hasn't the Deep Learning community embraced Julia yet?
-
Compile for faster execution?
If you strongly prefer to run scripts though, then you can use the package https://github.com/dmolina/DaemonMode.jl in order to re-use a Julia session between multiple scripts, saving you recompilation time.
What are some alternatives?
dextool - Suite of C/C++ tooling built on LLVM/Clang
julia - The Julia Programming Language
codechecker - CodeChecker is an analyzer tooling, defect database and viewer extension for the Clang Static Analyzer and Clang Tidy
Makie.jl - Interactive data visualizations and plotting in Julia
compiler-benchmark - Benchmarks compilation speeds of different combinations of languages and compilers.
HTTP.jl - HTTP for Julia
Apache Thrift - Apache Thrift
FromFile.jl - Julia enhancement proposal (Julep) for implicit per file module in Julia
fastcov - A massively parallelized gcov wrapper
julia-numpy-fortran-test - Comparing Julia vs Numpy vs Fortran for performance and code simplicity
PackageCompiler.jl - Compile your Julia Package
DataFramesMeta.jl - Metaprogramming tools for DataFrames