ShareX VS Chocolatey

ShareX. No macOS alternative (which I would have tried) comes close in terms of usability for uploading (parts of) screenshots automatically.

(Used ShareX to take screenshots with some image effects, hopefully they're not too much extra)

https://getsharex.com/ screenshot tool has the ability to upload images.

It's list of "image" upload destinations is maintained at: * https://github.com/ShareX/ShareX/tree/develop/ShareX.UploadersLib/ImageUploaders

ShareX: It can do

Wasn't there some issues with greenshot being dead in development? I think https://getsharex.com/ shares the same codebase, but needs some tweaking to prevent accidental uploads if you roll it out for users.

ShareX is the goat! https://github.com/ShareX/ShareX/

It would create confusion with Chocolatey.

Thanks, I didnt know about Chocolatey Software | Chocolatey - The package manager for Windows , it seems that I can then put them into a script to install several softwares.

How does it compare to Chocolatey? https://chocolatey.org/

You could use chocolatey and install with:

Installed with apt, dnf, brew, choco or Docker, k6 is available for every type of system or configuration.

chocolatey

> because we don't know .net

But Chocolatey is a totally different kind of project. ;-)

https://chocolatey.org

> Other than that I predict a lot of growing pains

Agreed. It's a larger, more nuanced, more finnicky problem.

It's probably too late now but use Chocolatey, so much simpler.