shapez.io VS qt5

Shapez , web'de oynanan demosu da var : https://shapez.io/

new to shapez.io , found it 2 day ago after 35 hours finished level 26 thanks to the blueprint library I built . with them its just drag drop and arrange as stages so I end up with 100% efficiency .

Basically I want factorio to look like https://shapez.io

Shapez perhaps?

mindustry perhaps, or see if shapez.io works in mobile browser

is masterplan tycoon like shapez.io or is it more of a puzzle game about solving specific issues. do we build a general "factory" and expand it or focus only on the current problem every time? It is very expensive in Turkey and I wanna be sure before buying it.

You could play a big chunk of the first one online for free at https://shapez.io/ to see if you like the core of the game at no risk (iirc, the free "demo" version on shapez.io includes everything that was in the first version of the game, it just doesn't have all the extra content from the later paid Steam version.)

When I was around that age, I was really into Final Fantasy and the Dragon Warrior series on the NES. I partially attribute them with developing my reading skills and vocabulary.

NES games might be a hard sell for a kid who's already been exposed to flashier games, but the SNES visuals hold up pretty well, and have some of the best RPGs: Chrono Trigger, Final Fantasy 6, Secret of Mana, etc. There are also the Pixel Remaster versions of Final Fantasy 1-6 available on PC and modern consoles. Of course, the problem with RPGs is they're mostly about performing violence...

https://shapez.io/ - Shapez is sort of a Factorio-lite. You "mine" shapes, and perform operations on them to satisfy the game's requirements. It starts out pretty simple, but the difficulty ramps up. The demo is playable in the browser.

https://www.openttd.org/ - OpenTTD is essentially a virtual train set. Yes, there are other modes of transportation available, but the trains are where it shines. Might not really be suitable for a child to play solo, it's rather complex.

So, clearly with your AP CS class and PLC logic knowledge, if you were dumped into a codebase like Hadoop, QT, or TensorFlow you'd be able to quickly and competently analyze what is going on with that code, understand all the libraries used, know the reasons why certain compromises were made, and be able to make suggestions on how to restructure the code in a different way? Because I've been programming for coming up on two decades and unless a system is within the domains that I have experience in, I would not be able to provide any useful information without a massive onboarding timeline, and definitely wouldn't be able to help redesign anything until actually coding within the system for a significant amount of time.

QT for example is more than sixteen thousand lines of code, developed by almost 100 contributors. This is the closest analog to what you would be trying to make.

The branches on https://github.com/qt/qt5/tree/5.15.2 only seem to show a maximum version of 5.15.2. I have also seen 5.15.9 somewhere, but no idea where to get it (or was it 5.14.9 and I am mistaken).

Have you ever tried contributing to Qt? I rather liked their use of submodules. https://github.com/qt/qt5

qt5