RVS_IPAddress
git-bug
RVS_IPAddress | git-bug | |
---|---|---|
2 | 57 | |
2 | 8,027 | |
- | - | |
10.0 | 6.5 | |
almost 2 years ago | about 2 months ago | |
Swift | Go | |
MIT License | GNU General Public License v3.0 only |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
RVS_IPAddress
-
Ask HN: Show me your half baked project
Well, these ones aren't "half-baked," but they are no longer being maintained (archived):
[0] https://github.com/RiftValleySoftware/RVS_IPAddress
[1] https://github.com/RiftValleySoftware/RVS_ParseXMLDuration
[2] https://github.com/RiftValleySoftware/RVS_ONVIF
This project is unfinished (I just walked away from it, as it wasn't really giving me what I wanted):
[3] https://github.com/RiftValleySoftware/RVS_GTDriver
This one is "half-baked," I believe. I never really took it particularly far:
[4] https://github.com/RiftValleySoftware/RVS_MediaServer
-
So, I went down the rabbit hole of buying GitHub Stars, so you won't have to
I absolutely couldn't care any less about how many stars my repos have. The fewer, the better.
I basically write my code for my own consumption. Some of my projects are kinda weird[0], because they were designed to fill a specific need at the time.
[0] https://github.com/RiftValleySoftware/RVS_IPAddress
git-bug
-
Show HN: Tegon: AI-first, open source alternative to Jira, Linear
I think git-bug[1] is the most popular project of that sort.
[1]: https://github.com/MichaelMure/git-bug
-
Radicle: Peer-to-Peer Collaboration with Git
Unfortunately github appears to be actively breaking the ability to use git-bug on large repositories (like nixpkgs):
https://github.com/MichaelMure/git-bug/issues/749#issuecomme...
-
Nintendo emulator 'Suyu' removed from Gitlab following DMCA request
True but getting less true by the day:
https://github.com/MichaelMure/git-bug
https://www.fossil-scm.org/home/doc/trunk/www/index.wiki
- CRDTs Turned Inside Out
-
Sourcehut and Codeberg are both currently experiencing a DDoS attack
Only not having access to https://todo.sr.ht made me to recognize fully, that I donβt have any access to it. https://github.com/MichaelMure/git-bug suddenly looks much more interesting.
-
Gothub: Alternative front-end for GitHub written with Go
Neither do the issues support. But there is git-bug [0].
[0]: https://github.com/MichaelMure/git-bug
-
git-appraise β Distributed Code Review for Git
As a sort of spiritual successor to git-appraise, I've been working on git-bug[1] which support issues and will at some point support kanban and code review. There is a few notables improvements:
- CRDT-like reusable data structure [2][3] for true p2p workflow and easily create new entities (code review ...)
- bidirectional bridges to github, gitlab ... to ease the transition or just use git-bug as a complement of those platform
- CLI, terminal UI and web UI, for different taste and integrate into your tooling/workflow
[1]: https://github.com/MichaelMure/git-bug
[2]: https://github.com/MichaelMure/git-bug/blob/master/doc/model...
[3]: https://github.com/MichaelMure/git-bug/blob/master/entity/da...
-
Show HN: Gitopia: Decentralized GitHub Alternative for Open Source Collaboration
> but that is for the development of the platform and network of Gitopia. For the end user the workflows remain almost the same for collaboration.
I have to disagree here. Accidental complexity in a system can have severe downstream impacts on end users, whether that be in the form of poor performance, unreliability, or just slow update cycles. It's not something you can paper over and completely hide from the user.
> Along with this the blockchain layer layer offers immutable, transparent and tamper proof versioning of code
Tamper-proof can be accomplished natively by signing [0]. receive.denyNonFastForwards and receive.denyDeletes[1] can be used to make a git repository immutable. Git commits are also already content-addressable. And transparency is achieved by just having the repo available for people to clone.
> along with the collaboration meta and augments the current collaboration flow
Could this augmentation not be accomplished by storing the collaboration information in the repo under a set of special-purpose branches? Like git-bug[2] or git-issue[3]? Coupled with GPG signatures and you've got your immutability, too!
> Along with this it enables us to provide a novel means to incentivize open-source contributions along with fostering a more decentralized approach for governance (even for projects), every token holder could have a say in the decision making, reducing the risk of undue influence by a single party, hence eliminating centralized control.
This one I'll grant you, but it's by far the least compelling aspect of the project to me. I don't think we're going to solve the centralization of GitHub by centralizing on a new plutocracy, I'd much rather see efforts towards full decentralization. There's nothing inherent to Git that requires that we all use the same set of servers.
[0] https://git-scm.com/book/en/v2/Git-Tools-Signing-Your-Work
[1] https://git-scm.com/book/en/v2/Customizing-Git-Git-Configura...
[2] https://github.com/MichaelMure/git-bug
[3] https://github.com/dspinellis/git-issue
-
So, I went down the rabbit hole of buying GitHub Stars, so you won't have to
Regarding the issues, there are some projects like git-bug https://github.com/MichaelMure/git-bug trying to embed these sorts of meta-work into git.
-
Let's Make Sure Github Doesn't Become the only Option
Probably git-bug is closer to what Fossil does: It uses Git as a storage engine, and can coexist with your code in the same physical repository, but the issues don't actually show up as source files. Instead, each issue is a special branch (buried in refs so it won't clutter up git branch) that has zero common ancestry with anything else. So in theory you can poke at it with Git, but really, the Git under the hood is mostly an implementation detail, and as long as you interact with those files through the tool, it guarantees you won't have merge conflicts.
What are some alternatives?
mawesome - π Github action to generate your own awesome list from project you've starred ordered by languages!
git-issue - Git-based decentralized issue management
comment-castles - Lightweight internet forum
EdenSCM - A Scalable, User-Friendly Source Control System. [Moved to: https://github.com/facebook/sapling]
LookAtThat - Render source code in 3D, for macOS and iOS.
nessie - Nessie: Transactional Catalog for Data Lakes with Git-like semantics
RVS_MediaServer - Translating Streaming Video Server (Work In Progress)
Kaiserreich-4-Bug-Reports - Issue tracker for Kaiserreich for Hearts of Iron 4
Smithereen - Federated, ActivityPub-compatible social network server with friends, walls, and groups.
dolt - Dolt β Git for Data
trystero - β¨π€β¨ Build instant multiplayer webapps, no server required β Magic WebRTC matchmaking over BitTorrent, Nostr, MQTT, IPFS, and Firebase
gumtree - An awesome code differencing tool