SaaSHub helps you find the best software and product alternatives Learn more →
Git-bug Alternatives
Similar projects and alternatives to git-bug
-
-
InfluxDB
Power Real-Time Data Analytics at Scale. Get real-time insights from all types of time series data with InfluxDB. Ingest, query, and analyze billions of data points in real-time with unbounded cardinality.
-
Gitea
Git with a cup of tea! Painless self-hosted all-in-one software development service, including Git hosting, code review, team collaboration, package registry and CI/CD
-
-
-
bob
SQL query builder and ORM/Factory generator for Go with support for PostgreSQL, MySQL and SQLite (by stephenafamo)
-
EdenSCM
Discontinued A Scalable, User-Friendly Source Control System. [Moved to: https://github.com/facebook/sapling]
-
WorkOS
The modern identity platform for B2B SaaS. The APIs are flexible and easy-to-use, supporting authentication, user identity, and complex enterprise features like SSO and SCIM provisioning.
-
Camlistore
Perkeep (née Camlistore) is your personal storage system for life: a way of storing, syncing, sharing, modelling and backing up content.
-
-
SQLite
Unofficial git mirror of SQLite sources (see link for build instructions) (by mackyle)
-
-
codebase-visualizer-action
Visualize your codebase during CI.
-
-
-
-
-
Scrabble Solver by Kamil Mielnik
Free, open-source, and cross-platform analysis tool for Scrabble, Super Scrabble & Literaki. Quickly find top scoring words using given letters and board state. Available in English, French, German, Persian, Polish, Romanian & Spanish.
-
-
Kaiserreich-4-Bug-Reports
Issue tracker for Kaiserreich for Hearts of Iron 4
-
-
SaaSHub
SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews. SaaSHub helps you find the best software and product alternatives
NOTE:
The number of mentions on this list indicates mentions on common posts plus user suggested alternatives.
Hence, a higher number means a better git-bug alternative or higher similarity.
git-bug reviews and mentions
Posts with mentions or reviews of git-bug.
We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives
and similar projects. The last one was on 2024-03-30.
-
Radicle: Peer-to-Peer Collaboration with Git
Unfortunately github appears to be actively breaking the ability to use git-bug on large repositories (like nixpkgs):
https://github.com/MichaelMure/git-bug/issues/749#issuecomme...
-
Nintendo emulator 'Suyu' removed from Gitlab following DMCA request
True but getting less true by the day:
- CRDTs Turned Inside Out
-
Sourcehut and Codeberg are both currently experiencing a DDoS attack
Only not having access to https://todo.sr.ht made me to recognize fully, that I don’t have any access to it. https://github.com/MichaelMure/git-bug suddenly looks much more interesting.
-
Gothub: Alternative front-end for GitHub written with Go
Neither do the issues support. But there is git-bug [0].
-
git-appraise – Distributed Code Review for Git
As a sort of spiritual successor to git-appraise, I've been working on git-bug[1] which support issues and will at some point support kanban and code review. There is a few notables improvements:
- CRDT-like reusable data structure [2][3] for true p2p workflow and easily create new entities (code review ...)
- bidirectional bridges to github, gitlab ... to ease the transition or just use git-bug as a complement of those platform
- CLI, terminal UI and web UI, for different taste and integrate into your tooling/workflow
[1]: https://github.com/MichaelMure/git-bug
[2]: https://github.com/MichaelMure/git-bug/blob/master/doc/model...
[3]: https://github.com/MichaelMure/git-bug/blob/master/entity/da...
-
Show HN: Gitopia: Decentralized GitHub Alternative for Open Source Collaboration
> but that is for the development of the platform and network of Gitopia. For the end user the workflows remain almost the same for collaboration.
I have to disagree here. Accidental complexity in a system can have severe downstream impacts on end users, whether that be in the form of poor performance, unreliability, or just slow update cycles. It's not something you can paper over and completely hide from the user.
> Along with this the blockchain layer layer offers immutable, transparent and tamper proof versioning of code
Tamper-proof can be accomplished natively by signing [0]. receive.denyNonFastForwards and receive.denyDeletes[1] can be used to make a git repository immutable. Git commits are also already content-addressable. And transparency is achieved by just having the repo available for people to clone.
> along with the collaboration meta and augments the current collaboration flow
Could this augmentation not be accomplished by storing the collaboration information in the repo under a set of special-purpose branches? Like git-bug[2] or git-issue[3]? Coupled with GPG signatures and you've got your immutability, too!
> Along with this it enables us to provide a novel means to incentivize open-source contributions along with fostering a more decentralized approach for governance (even for projects), every token holder could have a say in the decision making, reducing the risk of undue influence by a single party, hence eliminating centralized control.
This one I'll grant you, but it's by far the least compelling aspect of the project to me. I don't think we're going to solve the centralization of GitHub by centralizing on a new plutocracy, I'd much rather see efforts towards full decentralization. There's nothing inherent to Git that requires that we all use the same set of servers.
[0] https://git-scm.com/book/en/v2/Git-Tools-Signing-Your-Work
[1] https://git-scm.com/book/en/v2/Customizing-Git-Git-Configura...
-
So, I went down the rabbit hole of buying GitHub Stars, so you won't have to
Regarding the issues, there are some projects like git-bug https://github.com/MichaelMure/git-bug trying to embed these sorts of meta-work into git.
-
Let's Make Sure Github Doesn't Become the only Option
Probably git-bug is closer to what Fossil does: It uses Git as a storage engine, and can coexist with your code in the same physical repository, but the issues don't actually show up as source files. Instead, each issue is a special branch (buried in refs so it won't clutter up git branch) that has zero common ancestry with anything else. So in theory you can poke at it with Git, but really, the Git under the hood is mostly an implementation detail, and as long as you interact with those files through the tool, it guarantees you won't have merge conflicts.
-
Clocks and Causality – Ordering Events in Distributed Systems
You might be interested by git-bug and https://github.com/MichaelMure/git-bug/blob/master/doc/model..., which seems to be exactly what you describe. (Disclaimer: author).
-
A note from our sponsor - SaaSHub
www.saashub.com | 19 Apr 2024
Stats
Basic git-bug repo stats
56
7,993
6.3
5 days ago
MichaelMure/git-bug is an open source project licensed under GNU General Public License v3.0 only which is an OSI approved license.
The primary programming language of git-bug is Go.
SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews
SaaSHub helps you find the best software and product alternatives
www.saashub.com