RAVE VS virtualagc

Also, theres new tools like https://github.com/acids-ircam/RAVE which can be used to create new sounds, i feel like the more granular you work with AI on art, the better can help you out. Magentajs is pretty cool! Im still just playing with it but is easy to use so far.

https://github.com/acids-ircam/RAVE hope this wasn't too much off topic, i'm just super enthusiastic about RAVE and have been trying to squeeze a sonification in with it with no good applications so far. this feels kinda awesome tho. maybe it fits?

I'm in the deep learning music scene, which is due for its stable diffusion moment in the next year or two. The (primarily) timbre transfer system called RAVE is where I'm starting, and my contribution is to optimize the system to improve training time.

[] https://github.com/acids-ircam/RAVE/tree/master/rave

I'm obsessed with generative audio models, particularly RAVE[0].

Music is set to have its GPT-3 / Stable Diffusion moment within a couple years.

I believe in 10 years the venn diagram of music made with computers and music made with neural nets will be a circle, and that now is a great time to jump in.

Would LOVE to swap notes with anyone else here into this. Email in bio.

[0] https://github.com/acids-ircam/RAVE

Source code is here: https://github.com/caillonantoine/RAVE

I don't think that's a great example.

For instance, I can step through and even modify that code using tooling like AGC emulators like this one http://www.ibiblio.org/apollo/#gsc.tab=0

What makes it open source is access to the same level of source access that the original developers worked in.

That's what's missing here. Mistral's engineers do not simply open this binary in their editor to do their job.

Glad you're enjoying the videos! I'm Mike from them. :) The Apollo 14 code I linked above was reconstructed in the same way as Luminary 69/2, but the process was far, far too involved for a video. Like I said above, I probably won't be much help with math, but I'd be more than happy to assist with finding documentation or navigating AGC code whenever you want!

The fact that all the information about the computer and software is public and you can verify it yourself like thousands of people have. https://www.ibiblio.org/apollo/

If you’re curious about the the technical specs of the AGC check out Ron Burkey’s website, it’s even got the source code for you to see for yourself: https://www.ibiblio.org/apollo/

Of course you should be able to tell us because all the hardware architecture and software can be found here. So you must have fully reviewed it and located the issues. Right? Than please point out where the error is.

It had manually encoded ROM in the form of "core rope memory", which is pretty wacky, but it was a digital computer. In fact, it was the first IC computer.

You can learn way too much about it and even operate (a simulation of) one here: http://www.ibiblio.org/apollo/