Quantum-Nox-Firefox-Dark-Full-Theme
uBlock
Quantum-Nox-Firefox-Dark-Full-Theme | uBlock | |
---|---|---|
20 | 2,992 | |
371 | 43,126 | |
- | - | |
8.5 | 9.9 | |
about 2 years ago | 14 days ago | |
JavaScript | JavaScript | |
Mozilla Public License 2.0 | GNU General Public License v3.0 only |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
Quantum-Nox-Firefox-Dark-Full-Theme
-
Any way to enable multiple tab rows in Waterfox G3.0.1 (64-bit)?
*Firefox multiple tab rows (works in 109.01 https://github.com/Izheil/Quantum-Nox-Firefox-Dark-Full-Theme/releases
-
Re-applying custom scrollbar appearance
I've been using the QuantumNox dark theme downloaded a year ago, that I've been tweaking for personal preferences. However, that's entirely just been changing values and I would not call myself even a novice at css. Unfortunately, that project has been discontinued and archived, so I cannot ask for support there.
-
update broke window controls placement, userchrome doesn't seem to be responding to new changes even though my old css is active
Based on my intuition about a common cause leading to problems for many of us, I decided to look into whether any variable values were set within :root in my chrome directory files. Lo and behold, that was my problem. I simply changed every use of the variables to a constant, and everything worked like a charm.I am using Multirow-Patcher-Quantum-Nox-Installer-Windows-1.8.4.exe from https://github.com/Izheil/Quantum-Nox-Firefox-Dark-Full-Theme/releases in order to allow multiple tab rows without losing the ability to reorder tabs. I was able to quickly fix the javascript file created with the scrollable rows option (chrome/MultiRowTab-scrollable.uc.js). My first attempt at fixing the autohide file didn't work, but I have only spent a few minutes on it so far.
- After seeing all the FF memes, this had to be said.
-
Why don't any browsers natively support multi-row tabs?
https://github.com/Izheil/Quantum-Nox-Firefox-Dark-Full-Theme now has a working patch for FF 101, even an installer. Golden. https://github.com/Aris-t2/CustomCSSforFx is also very, very useful.
-
Multi Row Tabs and RestartFirefoxButton_Movable Have Stopped Working Since Firefox Nightly 100
Try version 1.8.3 and clear your startup cache (about:profiles > current profile > local folder > startupcache folder > delete all its contents) after closing FF to restart it.
-
How to disable dark mode?
I simply copied the two lockPref lines postet by Wronschien to my config.js file because I already have js stuff coming along with the Izheil Multi-Row-Tabs: https://github.com/Izheil/Quantum-Nox-Firefox-Dark-Full-Theme/releases which didn't accept a new autoconfig.js and a firefox.cfg.
-
Is it possible making the page black while loading a page instead of white?
I use Quantum Nox theme and there's a section in the FAQ that could help you:
-
Google had a plan called “Project NERA” to turn the web into a walled garden
Check out an even better option (in my opinion): multi-row tabs
https://github.com/Izheil/Quantum-Nox-Firefox-Dark-Full-Them...
-
Firefox 89 - Multiple tab rows broken - Manual install new patch/tweak?
Normally you just need to install this tweak: https://github.com/Izheil/Quantum-Nox-Firefox-Dark-Full-Theme/releases
uBlock
- Apr 24th is JavaScript Naked Day – Browse the web without JavaScript
- Mobile Ad Blocker Will No Longer Stop YouTube's Ads
-
Some notes on Firefox's media autoplay settings in practice as of Firefox 124
Check out uBlock Origin's per site switches [1]
[1]: https://github.com/gorhill/uBlock/wiki/Per-site-switches#no-...
-
Brave's AI assistant now integrates with PDFs and Google Drive
If ads, in particular on YouTube, are the problem, anything Chromium-based is probably only going to get worse and worse (see [1] and [2]). So that basically leaves you with Firefox and Safari.
I work for Mozilla (speaking for myself, of course), so I'll leave you to guess which I'd recommend :P
[1] https://github.com/gorhill/uBlock/wiki/uBlock-Origin-works-b...
[2] https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2023/09/googles-widely-oppos...
-
X.org Server Clears Out Remnants for Supporting Old Compilers
https://github.com/gorhill/uBlock
Or if on mobile, it is well worth it to look up adblock options for the browser you use.
-
Mozilla thinks Apple, Google, Microsoft should play fair
What are the compelling advantages of Chrome nowadays?
Chrome is working to limit the capabilities of ad blockers:
https://www.malwarebytes.com/blog/news/2023/11/chrome-pushes...
Whereas a compelling advantage of Firefox is that uBlock Origin works best in Firefox:
https://github.com/gorhill/uBlock/wiki/uBlock-Origin-works-b...
Advertising networks have often been vectors for malware. Using an ad blocker is an important security measure. Even the FBI recommends ad blockers:
https://www.malwarebytes.com/malvertising
https://theconversation.com/spyware-can-infect-your-phone-or...
https://www.ic3.gov/Media/Y2022/PSA221221?=8324278624
-
Brave Leo now uses Mixtral 8x7B as default
> It allows for 30,000 dynamic rules
That is not what we mean by dynamic filters. From https://developer.chrome.com/blog/improvements-to-content-fi...
> However, to support more frequent updates and user-defined rules, extensions can add rules dynamically too, without their developers having to upload a new version of the extension to the Chrome Web Store.
What Chrome is talking about is the ability to specify rules at runtime. What critics of Manifest V3 are talking about is not the ability to dynamically add rules (although that can be an issue), it is the ability to add dynamic rules -- ie rules that analyze and rewrite requests in the style of the blockingWebRequest permission.
It's a little deceptive to claim that the concerns here are outdated and to point to vague terminology that sounds like it's correcting the problem, but on actual inspection turns out to be entirely separate functionality from what the GP was talking about.
> Giving this ability to extensions can slow down the browser for the user. These ads can still be blocked through other means.
This is the debate; most of the adblocking community disagrees with this assertion. uBO maintains a list of some common features that are already not possible to support in Chrome ( https://github.com/gorhill/uBlock/wiki/uBlock-Origin-works-b... ) and has written about features that are not able to be supported via Chrome's current V3 API ( https://github.com/uBlockOrigin/uBOL-home/wiki/Frequently-as... ). Of particular note are filtering for large media elements (I use this a lot on mobile Firefox, it's great for reducing page size), and top-level filtering of domains/fonts.
- uBlock Origin – 1.55.0
-
In 2024, please switch to Firefox
> "Its happened before"
> That's not an argument
It's a subheading to "2. Browser engine monopoly". The subsection's purpose is describing how bad things were during the IE monopoly to reinforce that it's something to be avoided.
> in fact you could counter-argue that IE left a lot of technical debt
That would be agreeing with the article, unless I understand what you mean.
> On top of that, the internet was very different back then.
In a way that now makes it harder for truly new competing engines to pop up due to increased complexity of the web.
> I'm still not convinced, why would I change my browser?
The points made in the article are:
* Increased privacy, opposed to willingly giving your data to an ad-tech company
* Helps avoid a browser engine monopoly which would effectively let Google dictate web standards
* It’s fast and has a nice user interface
Onto which I'd add:
* Content blockers work best on Firefox (https://github.com/gorhill/uBlock/wiki/uBlock-Origin-works-b...), doubly so when Manifest V3 rolls out
* Allows more customization of interface and home page
* UX improvements, like the clutter-free reader mode, aren't vetoed to protect search revenue as with Chrome (https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37675467)
-
Ask HN: Is Firefox team too small to do serious security tests?
Advertising networks are vectors for malware:
https://www.cisecurity.org/insights/blog/malvertising
https://www.malwarebytes.com/malvertising
https://theconversation.com/spyware-can-infect-your-phone-or...
So if you're concerned about security then you want the browser with the best ad blocker.
uBlock Origin works best in Firefox:
https://github.com/gorhill/uBlock/wiki/uBlock-Origin-works-b...
What are some alternatives?
Firefox-UI-Fix - 🦊 I respect proton UI and aim to improve it.
VideoAdBlockForTwitch - Blocks Ads on Twitch.tv.
treestyletab - Tree Style Tab, Show tabs like a tree.
Spotify-Ad-Blocker - EZBlocker - A Spotify Ad Blocker for Windows
CustomCSSforFx - Custom CSS tweaks for Firefox
bypass-paywalls-chrome - Bypass Paywalls web browser extension for Chrome and Firefox.
stylus-UserCSS - Collection of my UserCSS styles for Stylus browser extension
duckduckgo-privacy-extension - DuckDuckGo Privacy Essentials browser extension for Firefox, Chrome.
rainfox - Photon UI, re-imagined.
ClearUrls
FirefoxFullDarkThemeTemplate - Color Template for Full Dark theme on Firefox
AdNauseam - AdNauseam: Fight back against advertising surveillance