Programming-Language-Benchmark
FizzBuzz Enterprise Edition
Programming-Language-Benchmark | FizzBuzz Enterprise Edition | |
---|---|---|
5 | 329 | |
- | 20,505 | |
- | 0.6% | |
- | 0.0 | |
- | 6 days ago | |
Java | ||
- | - |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
Programming-Language-Benchmark
- Rust vs Zig Benchmarks
-
Ask HN: What are some of the most elegant codebases in your favorite language?
I found Zig implementation of json parsing is interesting. The code is free from hidden control flow !.
https://github.com/hanabi1224/Programming-Language-Benchmark...
-
Nim vs Rust Benchmarks
It appears helloworld is the only test with any repeats, and it only has 5 repeats. https://github.com/hanabi1224/Programming-Language-Benchmark...
Here's the measurement code, it appears to be significantly more complicated than a simple fork/exec/wait loop but that could just be all the C# getting in the way: https://github.com/hanabi1224/Programming-Language-Benchmark... Nevertheless you are probably right that the bulk of this 1.8ms is in the executable under test, and it truly is just bloat. Running `hyperfine ./empty-main-function` from rustc on my Mac gives 0.8ms.
-
Which programming language or compiler is faster
Is faster... on code that has been optimized to hell and back 5 times over and no longer resembles anything like normal code written in the language.
Seriously, this is the code for the top program. I'm reasonably sure 99% of C++ programmers could not decipher it without spending significant amounts of time on google: https://github.com/hanabi1224/Programming-Language-Benchmark...
I appreciate that fair benchmarks across languages are a hard problem, but this is not a good solution to it. Any reference to this data as a comparison between "programming languages and compilers" needs to come with a giant disclaimer that it's comparing them at something you almost certainly don't use them for, and is very far from their main use case.
I also appreciate that this is a repetitive comment the likes of which always come up when this benchmark is mentioned... but I really don't see another way to avoid people misinterpreting it. Very few people are going to spontaneously click through to the code.
FizzBuzz Enterprise Edition
- FizzBuzzEnterpriseEdition
-
Simple Lasts Longer
That "Hello World Enterprise Edition" looks dangerously under-engineered - I could understand it! Far better to follow the best practices demonstrated in the Fizz Buzz Enterprise Edition...
https://github.com/EnterpriseQualityCoding/FizzBuzzEnterpris...
-
Writing Clean Code with FastAPI Dependency Injection
Clean code is a balancing act - you’ll want to make sure you don’t turn your codebase into something like this.
- Milyen hasznos Github repokat ismertek?
-
Yazılım sektörünü bırakmaya değer mi?
Bu hocam https://github.com/EnterpriseQualityCoding/FizzBuzzEnterpriseEdition
-
oopWentTooFar
amidoingitright
- 7+ layer generic architecture libraries are crying rn
- Primeagen Code Review - EnterpriseQualityCoding/FizzBuzzEnterpriseEdition: FizzBuzz Enterprise Edition is a no-nonsense implementation of FizzBuzz made by serious businessmen for serious business purposes.
-
Is Entreprise code unavoidable?
It seems to me that all large software projects eventually grow into "Enterprise" code. What I mean by this is something like FizzBuzz Enterprise Edition; large codebases with many layers where Design Patterns and SOLID principles are applied vigorously.
-
Java 21 makes me like Java again
???
I'll answer your question with a question: Have you seen https://github.com/EnterpriseQualityCoding/FizzBuzzEnterpris... ? :)
I'm guess that to those of us who remember when Java came out, "FizzBuzz: EE" is what we think of when we think of Java. :P
In Java I have to type a bazillion characters to get anything done! And make all these useless directories and files and InterfaceClassFactoryProtocolStreamingSerializer BS. And worry about how that executes.
C++? No bloat*, just speed
*Yes, there's some _optional_ bloat. But compared to Java? no contest.
What are some alternatives?
Programming-Language-Benchmarks - Yet another implementation of computer language benchmarks game
Logback - The reliable, generic, fast and flexible logging framework for Java.
rosettaboy - A gameboy emulator in several different languages
awesome-functional-python - A curated list of awesome things related to functional programming in Python.
awesome-python-typing - Collection of awesome Python types, stubs, plugins, and tools to work with them.
Simple Java Mail - Simple API, Complex Emails (Jakarta Mail smtp wrapper)
matrixmultiply - General matrix multiplication of f32 and f64 matrices in Rust. Supports matrices with general strides.
yGuard - The open-source Java obfuscation tool working with Ant and Gradle by yWorks - the diagramming experts
cosmopolitan - build-once run-anywhere c library
bitburner - Bitburner Game
weave - A state-of-the-art multithreading runtime: message-passing based, fast, scalable, ultra-low overhead
Java-Hello-World-Enterprise-Edition