Programming-Language-Benchmark

By hanabi1224

Programming-Language-Benchmark Alternatives

Similar projects and alternatives to Programming-Language-Benchmark

NOTE: The number of mentions on this list indicates mentions on common posts plus user suggested alternatives. Hence, a higher number means a better Programming-Language-Benchmark alternative or higher similarity.

Programming-Language-Benchmark reviews and mentions

Posts with mentions or reviews of Programming-Language-Benchmark. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2023-06-17.
  • Rust vs Zig Benchmarks
    6 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 17 Jun 2023
  • Ask HN: What are some of the most elegant codebases in your favorite language?
    37 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 17 Jun 2023
    I found Zig implementation of json parsing is interesting. The code is free from hidden control flow !.

    https://github.com/hanabi1224/Programming-Language-Benchmark...

  • Nim vs Rust Benchmarks
    10 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 7 Feb 2022
    It appears helloworld is the only test with any repeats, and it only has 5 repeats. https://github.com/hanabi1224/Programming-Language-Benchmark...

    Here's the measurement code, it appears to be significantly more complicated than a simple fork/exec/wait loop but that could just be all the C# getting in the way: https://github.com/hanabi1224/Programming-Language-Benchmark... Nevertheless you are probably right that the bulk of this 1.8ms is in the executable under test, and it truly is just bloat. Running `hyperfine ./empty-main-function` from rustc on my Mac gives 0.8ms.

  • Which programming language or compiler is faster
    7 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 18 Dec 2021
    Is faster... on code that has been optimized to hell and back 5 times over and no longer resembles anything like normal code written in the language.

    Seriously, this is the code for the top program. I'm reasonably sure 99% of C++ programmers could not decipher it without spending significant amounts of time on google: https://github.com/hanabi1224/Programming-Language-Benchmark...

    I appreciate that fair benchmarks across languages are a hard problem, but this is not a good solution to it. Any reference to this data as a comparison between "programming languages and compilers" needs to come with a giant disclaimer that it's comparing them at something you almost certainly don't use them for, and is very far from their main use case.

    I also appreciate that this is a repetitive comment the likes of which always come up when this benchmark is mentioned... but I really don't see another way to avoid people misinterpreting it. Very few people are going to spontaneously click through to the code.

  • A note from our sponsor - SaaSHub
    www.saashub.com | 25 Apr 2024
    SaaSHub helps you find the best software and product alternatives Learn more →