Procursus VS appleprivacyletter

Taurine: https://repo.theodyssey.dev - https://apt.procurs.us unc0ver: https://apt.bingner.com/

Hi, Xina prevents me from adding https://apt.procurs.us

It would just be https://apt.procurs.us/

This will be fixed once it has been merged upstream.

E: Method https has died unexpectedly! E: Subprocess https has received signal 6. E: Method /usr/libexec/apt/methods/https did not start correctly" All of the errors had one thing in common: It always said it could "Not find the package" and told me to "refresh my sources". Which I did. Then I tried removing them and re-adding them. Then I tried reinstalling. Nothing is working. The sources I'm using are Odyessy (https://repo.theodyssey.dev), Havoc (https://havoc.app/), Procursus (https://apt.procurs.us), Chariz (https://repo.chariz.com/), Big Boss (http://apt.thebigboss.org/repofiles/cydia/), Karen's Repo (https://cydia.akemi.ai), and Opa334's repo (https://opa334.github.io/).

Also worth mentioning, someone else opened an issue on the Procursus github. Who knows, maybe a fix for that could inadvertently fix this.

https://lenglengyu.com/ https://acreson.github.io/mirror-rootless/ https://repo.alexia.lol/ http://apt.thebigboss.org/repofiles/cydia/ https://repo.chariz.com/ https://ellekit.space/ https://nahtedetihw.github.io/ https://frcoal.cfd/ https://havoc.app/ https://repo.icrazeios.com/ https://ios.jjolano.me/ https://johnnyb186.yourepo.com/ http://limneos.net/repo/ https://lizynz.github.io/ https://maxiwee.de/ https://repo.itznebbs.com/ https://opa334.github.io/ https://p2kdev.github.io/repo/ https://poomsmart.github.io/repo/ https://apt.procurs.us/ https://sparkdev.me/ https://tigisoftware.com/repo/ https://www.yourepo.com/

I just added this repo https://apt.procurs.us/ because i was messing around, turns out i’ve got like 50 updates from this repo, which would install 100+ packages.

Hi, the Global Encryption Coalition doesn't take stands as a Coalition but members often do... and 90 or so groups and experts wrote a letter earlier this year in opposition to that: https://appleprivacyletter.com/ (note that ISOC, where I work, did not join that letter)

Part of me wonders if the calculus includes either (a) the open letter signed by (effectively) ~10k verified developers [1], (b) the complaint letters from groups like the EFF [2, 3], or (c) expert and qualified input from their (presumably huge) marketing department...

[1] https://appleprivacyletter.com/

An Open Letter Against Apple's Privacy-Invasive Content Scanning Technology

(e.g. https://appleprivacyletter.com/)

In that light, FISA is relevant. My statement was to show that not all dealings of the US government are public, because not all courts and legal proceedings are available to the public. So "serious risk of leaks to journalists" won't likely happen in that case.

Thanks for this link. He mentions Apple Privacy Letter which is another petition for the same issue.

You can sign the petition against Apple here.

I suggest you read the open letter circulating to better understand the problems with Apple’s implementation.