Power-Fx VS flo_binding

Compare Power-Fx vs flo_binding and see what are their differences.

Power-Fx

Power Fx low-code programming language (by microsoft)
power-fx powerfx
Source Code
Suggest alternative
Edit details

flo_binding

A data-driven ('reactive') binding and state management library for Rust (by Logicalshift)
Reactive Binding data-driven Rust
Source Code
docs.rs
Suggest alternative
Edit details
WorkOS
Our great sponsors
  • WorkOS - The modern identity platform for B2B SaaS
  • InfluxDB - Power Real-Time Data Analytics at Scale
  • SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews
Our great sponsors
Power-Fx flo_binding
15 1
3,112 8
0.8% -
9.6 0.0
5 days ago over 1 year ago
C# Rust
MIT License Apache License 2.0
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.

Power-Fx

Posts with mentions or reviews of Power-Fx. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2022-06-04.

flo_binding

Posts with mentions or reviews of flo_binding. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2021-03-02.
  • Microsoft Power-Fx: a low-code general purpose programming language
    6 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 2 Mar 2021
    Power-Fx's formulas seem to be equivalent to property binding or functional reactive programming (as opposed to ReactiveX). The difference is that property binding and FRP are generally used in a precompiled GUI to automatically propagate changes made by users across program state, whereas Power-Fx seems to be more an integrated system with Smalltalk-style editable live programs, or low-code for makers rather than just developers. I hope this makes these more mainstream.

    - https://doc-snapshots.qt.io/qt6-dev/qproperty.html

    - https://github.com/Logicalshift/flo_binding

    - https://raphlinus.github.io/ui/druid/2019/11/22/reactive-ui....

    - https://raphlinus.github.io/rust/druid/2020/09/25/principled...

    Does anyone know how properties/FRP/Power-Fx compare to FRP frameworks, or ReactiveX, or MobX, or Svelte (JS)?

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Power-Fx and flo_binding you can also consider the following projects:

python-functions

mogwai - The minimalist, obvious, graphical, web application interface

wtfjs - 🤪 A list of funny and tricky JavaScript examples

emacs-module-rs - Rust binding and tools for Emacs's dynamic modules

localpdfmerger - Merge PDFs, optimize PDFs, and extract Information like Images from PDF Files locally inside your Browser

sciter - Sciter: the Embeddable HTML/CSS/JS engine for modern UI development

lowdefy - The config web stack for business apps - build internal tools, client portals, web apps, admin panels, dashboards, web sites, and CRUD apps with YAML or JSON.

CppCoreGuidelines - The C++ Core Guidelines are a set of tried-and-true guidelines, rules, and best practices about coding in C++

Rustler - Safe Rust bridge for creating Erlang NIF functions

onelinerizer - Shamelessly convert any Python 2 script into a terrible single line of code

PyO3 - Rust bindings for the Python interpreter

Power-Fx vs python-functions flo_binding vs mogwai Power-Fx vs wtfjs flo_binding vs emacs-module-rs Power-Fx vs localpdfmerger flo_binding vs sciter Power-Fx vs lowdefy flo_binding vs lowdefy Power-Fx vs CppCoreGuidelines flo_binding vs Rustler Power-Fx vs onelinerizer flo_binding vs PyO3