flo_binding

A data-driven ('reactive') binding and state management library for Rust (by Logicalshift)
Review Reactive Binding data-driven Rust
Source Code
docs.rs
Suggest alternative
Edit details
SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews
SaaSHub helps you find the best software and product alternatives
www.saashub.com
featured

Flo_binding Alternatives

Similar projects and alternatives to flo_binding

flo_binding

  1. sciter

    87 flo_binding VS sciter

    Sciter: the Embeddable HTML/CSS/JS engine for modern UI development

  2. SaaSHub

    SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews. SaaSHub helps you find the best software and product alternatives

    SaaSHub logo

  3. lowdefy

    52 flo_binding VS lowdefy

    The config web stack for business apps - build internal tools, client portals, web apps, admin panels, dashboards, web sites, and CRUD apps with YAML or JSON.

  4. Power-Fx

    15 flo_binding VS Power-Fx

    Power Fx low-code programming language

  5. mogwai

    4 flo_binding VS mogwai

    The minimalist, obvious, graphical, web application interface

  6. emacs-module-rs

    1 flo_binding VS emacs-module-rs

    Rust binding and tools for Emacs's dynamic modules

  7. PyO3

    157 flo_binding VS PyO3

    Rust bindings for the Python interpreter

  8. Rustler

    36 flo_binding VS Rustler

    Safe Rust bridge for creating Erlang NIF functions

NOTE: The number of mentions on this list indicates mentions on common posts plus user suggested alternatives. Hence, a higher number means a better flo_binding alternative or higher similarity.
Suggest an alternative to flo_binding

flo_binding discussion

Log in or Post with

flo_binding reviews and mentions

Posts with mentions or reviews of flo_binding. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2021-03-02.
  • Microsoft Power-Fx: a low-code general purpose programming language
    6 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 2 Mar 2021
    Power-Fx's formulas seem to be equivalent to property binding or functional reactive programming (as opposed to ReactiveX). The difference is that property binding and FRP are generally used in a precompiled GUI to automatically propagate changes made by users across program state, whereas Power-Fx seems to be more an integrated system with Smalltalk-style editable live programs, or low-code for makers rather than just developers. I hope this makes these more mainstream.

    - https://doc-snapshots.qt.io/qt6-dev/qproperty.html

    - https://github.com/Logicalshift/flo_binding

    - https://raphlinus.github.io/ui/druid/2019/11/22/reactive-ui....

    - https://raphlinus.github.io/rust/druid/2020/09/25/principled...

    Does anyone know how properties/FRP/Power-Fx compare to FRP frameworks, or ReactiveX, or MobX, or Svelte (JS)?

Stats

Basic flo_binding repo stats
1
8
0.0
over 2 years ago

Logicalshift/flo_binding is an open source project licensed under Apache License 2.0 which is an OSI approved license.

The primary programming language of flo_binding is Rust.

Popular Comparisons

  1. flo_binding VS mogwai
  2. flo_binding VS emacs-module-rs
  3. flo_binding VS lowdefy
  4. flo_binding VS Power-Fx
  5. flo_binding VS PyO3
  6. flo_binding VS sciter
  7. flo_binding VS Rustler

Sponsored
SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews
SaaSHub helps you find the best software and product alternatives
www.saashub.com

Did you know that Rust is
the 5th most popular programming language
based on number of references?

Loading...