Orchard Core VS craftsman

In open source OrchardCore is ok in terms of project-complexity. When building OrchardCore (AVG 10 runs): https://github.com/OrchardCMS/OrchardCore with $git clean -fdx && dotnet build OrchardCore.sln --force Macbook: Time Elapsed 00:02:13 (AVG 10 runs) Dell: Time Elapsed 00:02:48

While I've been peripherally present in the game industry through my activity here and on GitHub as a Godot contributor, the vast majority of my time as a developer for the past 5 and a half years has been in web development (largely server/database with some frontend) so take that as you will. In that time, I've seen, worked in, and outgrown several project architectures. At this point, I think I've gotten to know the one that works the best, in part because while it has worked for me, it's also the same one that Microsoft employs to maintain its high-profile open-source projects (which are orders of magnitude more complex than anything I've come up with). A good example is the Orchard Core CMS.

Check out orchardcore, the framework not the cms https://github.com/OrchardCMS/OrchardCore it implements multi tenancy pretty easily

The project code is available in the repository on GitHub. We check the code with the PVS-Studio static code analyzer.

If you do want a .NET IdP then you could look into OpenIddict but will require some hands on work, at a minimum authorisation controllers. If you're looking for something more out of the box OrchardCore's OpenId module might be better for you.

As the older roadmap says, it was to be released in 2019. https://github.com/OrchardCMS/OrchardCore/wiki/Roadmap/a4277c874b4f7480c55f02d5a148e4bbb2ff0bcf

Orchard Core Framework (https://github.com/OrchardCMS/OrchardCore/), is a really good technique to implement modularity. Every module is self contained and you can share resources as needed.

There’s some stuff I’d tweak on this project but it has some more advanced concepts you can check out. If you want to play around with something similar (several updates since this project) and get past the boilerplate you can check out this project.

If you’re having trouble getting started backend wise, I made a tool that can scaffold some boilerplate for you. You can also check out projects like Jason or ardalis’s clean architecture projects. Here’s one that’s a little dated but still good.

If you’re interested, something like this is a more built out project I built a while back. It’s not done and I’d change several things looking back, but it gives you an idea. If you want to try something similar you can scaffold out an api with this tool, but there are other good projects you can reference as well!

If you’re interested, I made a tool that scaffolds out an API for you. Saves us a lot of time at work and sets up a lot of the boilerplate for you. You can also customize it for yourself with whatever changes you want.

And here’s a project scaffolding tool

I’ve been building out an OSS tool that scaffolds web api boilerplate for about two years now and I’ve learned a lot throughout the process. I wanted to take an opportunity to really dog food a DDD like flow with it and came up with the sandbox project for an Accessioning model within a LIMS (essentially intake for lab orders) since I have some background there.

Lots of resources out there. You can scaffold a vertically sliced ddd project with this tool. Here’s a slightly modded example from what it produces.

About 2 years ago now, I decided to take my .NET template project a bit further and made a code scaffolding tool called Craftsman. The idea is that I can write a simple description of my project using yaml or json and get all the boilerplate set up for me so I could jump right into business logic. These files aren't a source of truth, just a description to get things started. It's getting closer to a stable v1, but it's not there yet.

I don’t think there’s one singular right way to make it good. Personally, I’ve found vertical slice architecture and DDD to encourage a very maintainable codebase. I have this project that I’ve been building and iterating on with what I’ve found works well for me.