OpenSMTPD VS FizzBuzz Enterprise Edition

Any MTA will do, including OpenSMTPD, Postifix, Exim, Sendmail, qmail.

OpenSMTPD

opensmtpd Like: Reasonable sized, reasonably easy to configure Dislike: Easy to shoot yourself in the foot, DKIM setup is a p.i.t.a.

Sounds like OpenSMTPd https://www.opensmtpd.org/ in that its a rewrite of older confusing SMTP servers.

Any constructive suggestions about what beginners should refer to? Is there anything better than the FAQ? (And, any thoughts about a guide for smtpd? I know this is a rather different question, but I'd love to find something beyond just the manual pages at www.opensmtpd.org, )

OpenSMTPD\ (3 comments)

That "Hello World Enterprise Edition" looks dangerously under-engineered - I could understand it! Far better to follow the best practices demonstrated in the Fizz Buzz Enterprise Edition...

https://github.com/EnterpriseQualityCoding/FizzBuzzEnterpris...

Clean code is a balancing act - you’ll want to make sure you don’t turn your codebase into something like this.

Bu hocam https://github.com/EnterpriseQualityCoding/FizzBuzzEnterpriseEdition

amidoingitright

It seems to me that all large software projects eventually grow into "Enterprise" code. What I mean by this is something like FizzBuzz Enterprise Edition; large codebases with many layers where Design Patterns and SOLID principles are applied vigorously.

???

I'll answer your question with a question: Have you seen https://github.com/EnterpriseQualityCoding/FizzBuzzEnterpris... ? :)

I'm guess that to those of us who remember when Java came out, "FizzBuzz: EE" is what we think of when we think of Java. :P

In Java I have to type a bazillion characters to get anything done! And make all these useless directories and files and InterfaceClassFactoryProtocolStreamingSerializer BS. And worry about how that executes.

C++? No bloat*, just speed

*Yes, there's some _optional_ bloat. But compared to Java? no contest.