NoHarm
bitkeeper
| NoHarm | bitkeeper | |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | 7 | |
| 389 | 378 | |
| 0.0% | 1.3% | |
| 0.0 | 0.0 | |
| about 1 year ago | over 1 year ago | |
| C | ||
| GNU General Public License v3.0 or later | Apache License 2.0 |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
NoHarm
-
A leadership crisis in the Nix community
There are two licenses that include restrictions like that that I know of:
- https://github.com/raisely/NoHarm/blob/publish/LICENSE.md
- https://firstdonoharm.dev/
- Contributing to WebSockets – Cryptocurrency Users
-
The Perl Foundation is fragmenting over Code of Conduct enforcement
It hasn't. The particular "Master/Slave" terminology debate goes back to at least 2003, https://edition.cnn.com/2003/TECH/ptech/11/26/master.term.reut/ , and the git branch name debate seems to originate with various individuals proposing it back in 2018 https://github.com/raisely/NoHarm/issues/55
- Do No Harm License
- Anyone else find the ethical source movement to be a huge joke?
bitkeeper
- BitKeeper (GitHub Repository)
- master. that's is.
-
Is the name "Master" branch offensive?
This is not historically accurate, even in the narrow context of Git branch names. Git was initially written as a replacement for an old source control system named BitKeeper. BitKeeper had a concept of a “master repo” (the main remote repo); all other copies of the repo were “slave repos”. Example from the BitKeeper docs. Git inherited that naming convention.
- Casync – A Content-Addressable Data Synchronization Tool
-
Who gets to define what’s ‘racist?’
> git repositories don't have "slave" branches, just a "master' as in template or origin
That isn't true - master in git comes from master in BitKeeper which did have slave replicas.
https://github.com/bitkeeper-scm/bitkeeper/blob/master/doc/H...
-
The Perl Foundation is fragmenting over Code of Conduct enforcement
Git was originally based on Bitkeeper which uses the terminology in that way, for example: https://github.com/bitkeeper-scm/bitkeeper/blob/master/doc/HOWTO.ask
-
GitHub, f*ck your name change.
Git was created as a replacement for BitKeeper. BitKeeper does use the terminology master/slave. Thus, Git's use of master is in fact a reference to master/slave, not a master recording.
What are some alternatives?
Raku-Steering-Council - RSC Papers
Dungeondraft-Custom-Tags - This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
bazel-cache - Minimal cloud oriented Bazel gRPC cache
OX153 - OX153: The Oxford 153 Entitlement: Mark I - a new, unique, non-free, and strongly proprietary software license
casync - Content-Addressable Data Synchronization Tool
The-Humane-Software-License - A humane software license to save the world.
grumphp-license-task - Provide the license task for GrumPHP.
websockets - Library for building WebSocket servers and clients in Python
Standard-Source-Available-License - Standard Source Available License (SSAL)
ml5-library - Friendly machine learning for the web! 🤖