NoHarm vs Standard-Source-Available-License

NoHarm

Do No Harm software license - A licence for using software for good (by raisely)

License

Source Code

Suggest alternative

Edit details

Standard-Source-Available-License

Standard Source Available License (SSAL) (by collimarco)

License

Source Code

Suggest alternative

Edit details

Our great sponsors

InfluxDB - Power Real-Time Data Analytics at Scale

WorkOS - The modern identity platform for B2B SaaS

SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews

Our great sponsors

NoHarm		Standard-Source-Available-License
	Project
4	Mentions	2
389	Stars	9
0.5%	Growth	-
0.0	Activity	0.0
about 1 year ago	Latest Commit	almost 2 years ago
	Language
GNU General Public License v3.0 or later	License	-

The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.

NoHarm

Posts with mentions or reviews of NoHarm. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2022-07-20.

Contributing to WebSockets – Cryptocurrency Users
5 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 20 Jul 2022
The Perl Foundation is fragmenting over Code of Conduct enforcement
3 projects | /r/programming | 15 Aug 2021

It hasn't. The particular "Master/Slave" terminology debate goes back to at least 2003, https://edition.cnn.com/2003/TECH/ptech/11/26/master.term.reut/ , and the git branch name debate seems to originate with various individuals proposing it back in 2018 https://github.com/raisely/NoHarm/issues/55
Do No Harm License
1 project | /r/Licences | 25 Jul 2021
Anyone else find the ethical source movement to be a huge joke?
1 project | /r/linuxmasterrace | 16 Jul 2021

Standard-Source-Available-License

Posts with mentions or reviews of Standard-Source-Available-License. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2022-05-02.

Rails + stripe gem - should I make it commercial?
4 projects | /r/rails | 2 May 2022
Cuber is released under a source available license
1 project | dev.to | 28 Apr 2022

In particular we are adopting the Standard Source Available License (SSAL) and you can use Cuber for free for small / medium apps.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing NoHarm and Standard-Source-Available-License you can also consider the following projects:

Raku-Steering-Council - RSC Papers

katharos-license - An ethical license designed to prevent impure or destructive use of shared works.

Dungeondraft-Custom-Tags - This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

awesome-open-source-licensing - Cool links, tools & papers related to Open Source Licensing

OX153 - OX153: The Oxford 153 Entitlement: Mark I - a new, unique, non-free, and strongly proprietary software license

saasblog - Ruby on Rails SaaS blog with Stripe. Active Subscribers can view premium posts. User can select Plan and subscribe. User can manage subscription via Stripe Billing Portal.

The-Humane-Software-License - A humane software license to save the world.

cuber-gem - An automation tool that simplify the deployment of your apps on Kubernetes.

grumphp-license-task - Provide the license task for GrumPHP.

websockets - Library for building WebSocket servers and clients in Python

ml5-library - Friendly machine learning for the web! 🤖