NanoSDK VS nanomq

Compare NanoSDK vs nanomq and see what are their differences.

Our great sponsors
  • InfluxDB - Power Real-Time Data Analytics at Scale
  • WorkOS - The modern identity platform for B2B SaaS
  • SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews
NanoSDK nanomq
2 2
111 1,369
3.6% 6.1%
9.2 9.8
10 days ago 3 days ago
C C
MIT License MIT License
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.

NanoSDK

Posts with mentions or reviews of NanoSDK. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2022-08-31.

nanomq

Posts with mentions or reviews of nanomq. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2024-04-07.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing NanoSDK and nanomq you can also consider the following projects:

nghttp3 - HTTP/3 library written in C

emqtt-bench - Lightweight MQTT benchmark tool written in Erlang

NanoSDK - NanoSDK - MQTT 5.0-compliant SDK with QUIC support in NNG flavor [Moved to: https://github.com/emqx/NanoSDK]

CocoaMQTT - MQTT 5.0 client library for iOS and macOS written in Swift

emqtt - Erlang MQTT 5.0 Client

quant - QUIC implementation for POSIX and IoT platforms

nanosdk-java - The JNA binding of NanoSDK

lsquic - LiteSpeed QUIC and HTTP/3 Library

pynng-mqtt

quic - In-kernel QUIC implementation with Userspace handshake

emqx - The most scalable open-source MQTT broker for IoT, IIoT, and connected vehicles