NanoSDK VS quant

Compare NanoSDK vs quant and see what are their differences.

NanoSDK

NanoSDK - MQTT 5.0-compliant SDK with QUIC support in NNG flavor (by emqx)
Mqtt Nng SDK mqtt5 Quic NanoMsg
Source Code
nanomq.io
Suggest alternative
Edit details

quant

QUIC implementation for POSIX and IoT platforms (by NTAP)
Quic ietf riot-os Posix Netmap netapp-public
Source Code
Suggest alternative
Edit details
InfluxDB - Power Real-Time Data Analytics at Scale
Get real-time insights from all types of time series data with InfluxDB. Ingest, query, and analyze billions of data points in real-time with unbounded cardinality.
www.influxdata.com
featured
SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews
SaaSHub helps you find the best software and product alternatives
www.saashub.com
featured
NanoSDK quant
2 1
112 283
0.9% 1.4%
9.2 4.7
7 days ago 9 months ago
C C
MIT License BSD 2-clause "Simplified" License
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.

NanoSDK

Posts with mentions or reviews of NanoSDK. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2022-08-31.

quant

Posts with mentions or reviews of quant. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2023-01-07.
  • Production Twitter on One Machine: 100Gbps NICs and NVMe Are Fast
    5 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 7 Jan 2023
    https://github.com/NTAP/quant

    "Quant uses the warpcore zero-copy userspace UDP/IP stack, which in addition to running on on top of the standard Socket API has support for the netmap fast packet I/O framework, as well as the Particle and RIOT IoT stacks. Quant hence supports traditional POSIX platforms (Linux, MacOS, FreeBSD, etc.) as well as embedded systems."

What are some alternatives?

When comparing NanoSDK and quant you can also consider the following projects:

nanomq - An ultra-lightweight and blazing-fast Messaging broker/bus for IoT edge & SDV

f-stack - F-Stack is an user space network development kit with high performance based on DPDK, FreeBSD TCP/IP stack and coroutine API.

nghttp3 - HTTP/3 library written in C

twitterperf - Prototyping the performance of various components of a theoretical faster Twitter

quic - In-kernel QUIC implementation with Userspace handshake

fair-queuing-aware-congestion-control - Fair Queuing Aware Congestion Control – based on picoquic

CocoaMQTT - MQTT 5.0 client library for iOS and macOS written in Swift

NanoSDK - NanoSDK - MQTT 5.0-compliant SDK with QUIC support in NNG flavor [Moved to: https://github.com/emqx/NanoSDK]

ghz - Simple gRPC benchmarking and load testing tool

lsquic - LiteSpeed QUIC and HTTP/3 Library

k3s - Lightweight Kubernetes

NanoSDK vs nanomq quant vs f-stack NanoSDK vs nghttp3 quant vs twitterperf NanoSDK vs quic quant vs fair-queuing-aware-congestion-control NanoSDK vs CocoaMQTT quant vs nghttp3 NanoSDK vs NanoSDK quant vs ghz NanoSDK vs lsquic quant vs k3s