ModelingToolkitStandardLibrary.jl VS FunctionalModels.jl

Compare ModelingToolkitStandardLibrary.jl vs FunctionalModels.jl and see what are their differences.

InfluxDB - Power Real-Time Data Analytics at Scale
Get real-time insights from all types of time series data with InfluxDB. Ingest, query, and analyze billions of data points in real-time with unbounded cardinality.
www.influxdata.com
featured
SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews
SaaSHub helps you find the best software and product alternatives
www.saashub.com
featured
ModelingToolkitStandardLibrary.jl FunctionalModels.jl
2 1
98 113
- -
9.1 0.0
3 days ago over 2 years ago
Julia Julia
MIT License GNU General Public License v3.0 or later
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.

ModelingToolkitStandardLibrary.jl

Posts with mentions or reviews of ModelingToolkitStandardLibrary.jl. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2022-05-10.
  • Is Julia is a good first language for children/teens?
    1 project | /r/Julia | 29 May 2022
    I see, yes, RigidBodySim is in a bit of a bad place since Twan and Robin spend all of their time doing "real robotics projects" now (they are both at Boston Dynamics). I think it's fine though, since I don't think that that is the right implementation anymore anyways. Robotics simulators like Drake, (Diff)Taichi, MuJoCo, etc. end up numerically unstable when trying to model real physics, which is why still the big industrial simulations use Dymola. This is why these days it's all going the route of ModelingToolkit. MTK plus a differentiable simulator (DifferentialEquations.jl) already runs circles around MuJoCo and DiffTaichi, it just needs to complete its library to make building rigid body simulations a lot simpler. Once the mechanical components portion of the ModelingToolkit Standard Library is completed, we plan to demonstrate some things like control of UAVs and such. That's all slated for this year (and is connected to some things going on in JuliaSim), in which case I think we'll be in a much better state for this domain.
  • ‘Machine Scientists’ Distill the Laws of Physics from Raw Data
    8 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 10 May 2022
    The thing to watch in the space of Simulink/Modelica is https://github.com/SciML/ModelingToolkit.jl . It's an acausal modeling system similar to Modelica (though extended to things like SDEs, PDEs, and nonlinear optimization), and has a standard library (https://github.com/SciML/ModelingToolkitStandardLibrary.jl) similar to the MSL. There's still a lot to do, but it's pretty functional at this point. The two other projects to watch are FunctionalModels.jl (https://github.com/tshort/FunctionalModels.jl, which is the renamed Sims.jl), which is built using ModelingToolkit.jl and puts a more functional interface on it. Then there's Modia.jl (https://github.com/ModiaSim/Modia.jl) which had a complete rewrite not too long ago, and in its new form it's fairly similar to ModelingToolkit.jl and the differences are more in the details. For causal modeling similar to Simulink, there's Causal.jl (https://github.com/zekeriyasari/Causal.jl) which is fairly feature-complete, though I think a lot of people these days are going towards acausal modeling instead so flipping Simulink -> acausal, and in that transition picking up Julia, is what I think is the most likely direction (and given MTK has gotten 40,000 downloads in the last year, I think there's good data backing it up).

    And quick mention to bring it back to the main thread here, the DataDrivenDiffEq symbolic regression API gives back Symbolics.jl/ModelingToolkit.jl objects, meaning that the learned equations can be put directly into the simulation tools or composed with other physical models. We're really trying to marry this process modeling and engineering world with these "newer" AI tools.

FunctionalModels.jl

Posts with mentions or reviews of FunctionalModels.jl. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2022-05-10.
  • ‘Machine Scientists’ Distill the Laws of Physics from Raw Data
    8 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 10 May 2022
    The thing to watch in the space of Simulink/Modelica is https://github.com/SciML/ModelingToolkit.jl . It's an acausal modeling system similar to Modelica (though extended to things like SDEs, PDEs, and nonlinear optimization), and has a standard library (https://github.com/SciML/ModelingToolkitStandardLibrary.jl) similar to the MSL. There's still a lot to do, but it's pretty functional at this point. The two other projects to watch are FunctionalModels.jl (https://github.com/tshort/FunctionalModels.jl, which is the renamed Sims.jl), which is built using ModelingToolkit.jl and puts a more functional interface on it. Then there's Modia.jl (https://github.com/ModiaSim/Modia.jl) which had a complete rewrite not too long ago, and in its new form it's fairly similar to ModelingToolkit.jl and the differences are more in the details. For causal modeling similar to Simulink, there's Causal.jl (https://github.com/zekeriyasari/Causal.jl) which is fairly feature-complete, though I think a lot of people these days are going towards acausal modeling instead so flipping Simulink -> acausal, and in that transition picking up Julia, is what I think is the most likely direction (and given MTK has gotten 40,000 downloads in the last year, I think there's good data backing it up).

    And quick mention to bring it back to the main thread here, the DataDrivenDiffEq symbolic regression API gives back Symbolics.jl/ModelingToolkit.jl objects, meaning that the learned equations can be put directly into the simulation tools or composed with other physical models. We're really trying to marry this process modeling and engineering world with these "newer" AI tools.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing ModelingToolkitStandardLibrary.jl and FunctionalModels.jl you can also consider the following projects:

PySR - High-Performance Symbolic Regression in Python and Julia

diffeqpy - Solving differential equations in Python using DifferentialEquations.jl and the SciML Scientific Machine Learning organization

Modia.jl - Modeling and simulation of multidomain engineering systems

pySRURGS - Symbolic regression by uniform random global search

Causal.jl - Causal.jl - A modeling and simulation framework adopting causal modeling approach.

ModelingToolkit.jl - An acausal modeling framework for automatically parallelized scientific machine learning (SciML) in Julia. A computer algebra system for integrated symbolics for physics-informed machine learning and automated transformations of differential equations

auto-07p - AUTO is a publicly available software for continuation and bifurcation problems in ordinary differential equations originally written in 1980 and widely used in the dynamical systems community.