MLJ.jl
julia
MLJ.jl | julia | |
---|---|---|
6 | 350 | |
1,725 | 44,534 | |
0.6% | 0.5% | |
8.7 | 10.0 | |
1 day ago | 4 days ago | |
Julia | Julia | |
GNU General Public License v3.0 or later | MIT License |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
MLJ.jl
-
What is the Julia equivalent of Scikit-Learn?
MLJ.jl is a good Julia ML framework. There's also a Scikitlearn.jl but its more of a wrapper around the sklearn I believe
-
My experience working as a technical writer for MLJ
MLJ is a machine learning framework for Julia, which you can kind of infer from the article but it's not super obvious IMO.
-
[N] New BetaML v0.8: model definition, hyperparameters tuning and fitting in 2 lines
The Beta Machine Learning Toolkit is a package including many algorithms and utilities to implement machine learning workflows in Julia, with a detailed tutorial on its usage from Python or R (no wrapper packages are needed) and an extensive interface to MLJ.
-
Python vs Julia
You should definitely go with Julia. It has steeper learning curve than python, but it is way more powerful. As for the ecosystem, you shouldn't worry about that much: DataFrames.jl and friends is way better than pandas, MLJ.jl (https://github.com/alan-turing-institute/MLJ.jl) and FastAI.jl(https://github.com/FluxML/FastAI.jl) are great frameworks for regular ML and deepnet. And if at any point you get a feeling that you need some python library, you can always plug it in with PyCall.jl(https://github.com/JuliaPy/PyCall.jl).
-
sklearn equivalent for Julia?
Imho, Julia is more diverse in the sense that there is not a single popular ML library. Maybe the Julian equivalent for scikit-learn is MLJ.jl. There is also ScikitLearn.jl, which defines the usual interface of scikit-learn models, and specific algorithms then implement this interface.
-
Swift for TensorFlow Shuts Down
Then you haven't looked at Julia's ecosystem.
It may not be quite as mature, but it's getting there quickly.
It's also far more interoperable because of Julia's multiple dispatch and abstract types.
For example, the https://github.com/alan-turing-institute/MLJ.jl ML framework (sklearn on steroids), works with any table object that implements the Tables.jl interface out of the box, not just with dataframes.
That's just one example.
julia
-
Top Paying Programming Technologies 2024
34. Julia - $74,963
-
Optimize sgemm on RISC-V platform
I don't believe there is any official documentation on this, but https://github.com/JuliaLang/julia/pull/49430 for example added prefetching to the marking phase of a GC which saw speedups on x86, but not on M1.
-
Dart 3.3
3. dispatch on all the arguments
the first solution is clean, but people really like dispatch.
the second makes calling functions in the function call syntax weird, because the first argument is privileged semantically but not syntactically.
the third makes calling functions in the method call syntax weird because the first argument is privileged syntactically but not semantically.
the closest things to this i can think of off the top of my head in remotely popular programming languages are: nim, lisp dialects, and julia.
nim navigates the dispatch conundrum by providing different ways to define free functions for different dispatch-ness. the tutorial gives a good overview: https://nim-lang.org/docs/tut2.html
lisps of course lack UFCS.
see here for a discussion on the lack of UFCS in julia: https://github.com/JuliaLang/julia/issues/31779
so to sum up the answer to the original question: because it's only obvious how to make it nice and tidy like you're wanting if you sacrifice function dispatch, which is ubiquitous for good reason!
-
Julia 1.10 Highlights
https://github.com/JuliaLang/julia/blob/release-1.10/NEWS.md
-
Best Programming languages for Data Analysis📊
Visit official site: https://julialang.org/
-
Potential of the Julia programming language for high energy physics computing
No. It runs natively on ARM.
julia> versioninfo() Julia Version 1.9.3 Commit bed2cd540a1 (2023-08-24 14:43 UTC) Build Info: Official https://julialang.org/ release
-
Rust std:fs slower than Python
https://github.com/JuliaLang/julia/issues/51086#issuecomment...
So while this "fixes" the issue, it'll introduce a confusing time delay between you freeing the memory and you observing that in `htop`.
But according to https://jemalloc.net/jemalloc.3.html you can set `opt.muzzy_decay_ms = 0` to remove the delay.
Still, the musl author has some reservations against making `jemalloc` the default:
https://www.openwall.com/lists/musl/2018/04/23/2
> It's got serious bloat problems, problems with undermining ASLR, and is optimized pretty much only for being as fast as possible without caring how much memory you use.
With the above-mentioned tunables, this should be mitigated to some extent, but the general "theme" (focusing on e.g. performance vs memory usage) will likely still mean "it's a tradeoff" or "it's no tradeoff, but only if you set tunables to what you need".
-
Eleven strategies for making reproducible research the norm
I have asked about Julia's reproducibility story on the Guix mailing list in the past, and at the time Simon Tournier didn't think it was promising. I seem to recall Julia itself didnt have a reproducible build. All I know now is that github issue is still not closed.
https://github.com/JuliaLang/julia/issues/34753
-
Julia as a unifying end-to-end workflow language on the Frontier exascale system
I don't really know what kind of rebuttal you're looking for, but I will link my HN comments from when this was first posted for some thoughts: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31396861#31398796. As I said, in the linked post, I'm quite skeptical of the business of trying to assess relative buginess of programming in different systems, because that has strong dependencies on what you consider core vs packages and what exactly you're trying to do.
However, bugs in general suck and we've been thinking a fair bit about what additional tooling the language could provide to help people avoid the classes of bugs that Yuri encountered in the post.
The biggest class of problems in the blog post, is that it's pretty clear that `@inbounds` (and I will extend this to `@assume_effects`, even though that wasn't around when Yuri wrote his post) is problematic, because it's too hard to write. My proposal for what to do instead is at https://github.com/JuliaLang/julia/pull/50641.
Another common theme is that while Julia is great at composition, it's not clear what's expected to work and what isn't, because the interfaces are informal and not checked. This is a hard design problem, because it's quite close to the reasons why Julia works well. My current thoughts on that are here: https://github.com/Keno/InterfaceSpecs.jl but there's other proposals also.
-
Getaddrinfo() on glibc calls getenv(), oh boy
Doesn't musl have the same issue? https://github.com/JuliaLang/julia/issues/34726#issuecomment...
I also wonder about OSX's libc. Newer versions seem to have some sort of locking https://github.com/apple-open-source-mirror/Libc/blob/master...
but older versions (from 10.9) don't have any lockign: https://github.com/apple-oss-distributions/Libc/blob/Libc-99...
What are some alternatives?
ScikitLearn.jl - Julia implementation of the scikit-learn API https://cstjean.github.io/ScikitLearn.jl/dev/
jax - Composable transformations of Python+NumPy programs: differentiate, vectorize, JIT to GPU/TPU, and more
AutoMLPipeline.jl - A package that makes it trivial to create and evaluate machine learning pipeline architectures.
NetworkX - Network Analysis in Python
Enzyme.jl - Julia bindings for the Enzyme automatic differentiator
Lua - Lua is a powerful, efficient, lightweight, embeddable scripting language. It supports procedural programming, object-oriented programming, functional programming, data-driven programming, and data description.
PythonNet - Python for .NET is a package that gives Python programmers nearly seamless integration with the .NET Common Language Runtime (CLR) and provides a powerful application scripting tool for .NET developers.
rust-numpy - PyO3-based Rust bindings of the NumPy C-API
Distributions.jl - A Julia package for probability distributions and associated functions.
Numba - NumPy aware dynamic Python compiler using LLVM
pyTsetlinMachine - Implements the Tsetlin Machine, Convolutional Tsetlin Machine, Regression Tsetlin Machine, Weighted Tsetlin Machine, and Embedding Tsetlin Machine, with support for continuous features, multigranularity, clause indexing, and literal budget
F# - Please file issues or pull requests here: https://github.com/dotnet/fsharp