.emacs.d VS hologram.nvim

Not exactly creating but made this GNU Emacs

GNU Emacs not only an IDE also an OS in itself, you can do almost everything on it <3

Emacs stairs way to heaven *

I see a very few people know about Emacs robustness...

Checkout my Emacs: .emacd.d

Awesome! What's the difference between this and hologram? Would you like to support sixel so that it can be used in other terminals like alacritty?

hologram doesn't work for you? Although, there's a bit of an issue with images disappearing and to get them back I have to replace a character in the image's link.

There are some plugins to display images in nvim (edluffy/hologram.nvim), but it depends on the terminal and graphic protocol you use

kitty terminal can show image https://github.com/edluffy/hologram.nvim but i use peek.nvim to preview markdown

Hi good stuff! Is there any plans for hologram.nvim integration?

Nope, I used the hologram.nvim plugin to display the images, and it uses the kitty graphics protocol. That is why it only works with kitty.

The images can be drawn anywhere on the screen. Drawing inside an editor isn't too much work but requires some bookkeeping to handle scrolling, cropping and windows closing. See https://github.com/edluffy/hologram.nvim for an example of what is possible.

Im actually using hologram.nvim integrated with neorg (it only works in kitty + pngs for now)

Basic image manipulation/preview. This includes: 1) the ability to call external tools (draw.io/inkscape, etc) for simple image creation and insertion on the fly 2) removing an image link from markdown also removes the corresponding file 3) file preview inside neovim buffer. I just discovered a plugin that make this possible: hologram.nvim, has anyone tried it out?