Random VS tauri

Sure here is a an example (repository) (click "run" to see it work) contrasting the two in Rust, note that it is not fully symbolic, just the imaginary component. But the immediate advantage one can see is allowing direct computation without needing to modify the polynomial multiplication algorithm. (As noted in the source code, this is a purely theoretical advantage).

I can't help you with the specific website, but here's a trivial cli implementation of Game of Life.

I've been sitting on my hands when it comes to updating my library, but if you really want a fast test, you can use some of my research/implementation for RCPrime, with creditation of course. I'm not sure what algorithms FLINT uses, but I'm fairly certain that the RCPrime implementation is the most efficient for integers less than 2^35 (requiring 64 multiplications and only one strong fermat test) even if you implement with Montgomery exponentiation.

Here is a sample implementation along with the inverses of the first 128 primes (in hex). (Except 2, which can be easily checked by the &1 trick)

Not what one normally considers in CS, but producing a fast deterministic test for checking primality in the interval 0;2^64 with some extensions beyond. Fully constructing one to 2^128 is well beyond what is currently computable, however some progress has been made that surpasses published bounds.

Working on developing a faster and smaller primality check in the interval 0;2^64 with tentative extensions towards 2^65. While it performs satisfactorily for the intervals currently available, reducing the memory to less than other implementations is a major challenge.

See this other approach for a similar engine, that utilizes a linear bitvector to model cellular automata.

You are way overthinking it. For something like minesweeper you can just model an integer lattice, and use either a 1d vector of integers to represent the positions of the mines or a 1d bitvector and check the values in the chebyshev distance of 1 from the point. (If you use integers like in the first example, your system becomes a plane of 2^32, 2^32 dimensions and is bounded by the number of mines (64-bit integers) that can fit in your RAM)

You can look here for some slightly better ways to test for primality (ignore the different language).

RAND calls a hardware source of Johnson-Nyquist noise (basically electric static), and then performs some filtering on it to make sure that it's evenly distributed. There are faster methods, like a simple "linear" rng, but they frequently don't give as good results.

Hi, dear Tauri! Long time no see. I published my first post, Developing a Desktop Application via Rust and NextJS. The Tauri Way almost a year ago. Since then, Tauri has become stronger. I'm happy about that! And now, I am very pleased to make a useful contribution to the Tauri community. As a full-stack developer, I frequently face situations where I need to start a DB-based UI project as fast as possible. It's stressful if I need to start the project from 100% scratch. I prefer to keep some boilerplates on hand, which will save me time and nerves and will be the subject of this article.

Hey Thanks!

Just electron & vite. I might actually migrate off electron, Tauri (https://tauri.app/) seems to be getting more stable and it's gotten great reviews.

I think this is the boilerplate I used though https://github.com/cawa-93/vite-electron-builder.

Well the great thing about WebAssembly is that you can port QT or anything else to be at a layer below -- thanks to WebAssembly Interface Types[0] and the Component Model specification that works underneath that.

To over-simplify, the Component Model manages language interop, and WIT constrains the boundaries with interfaces.

IMO the problem here is defining a 90% solution for most window, tab, button, etc management, then building embeddings in QT, Flutter/Skia, and other lower level engines. Getting a good cross-platform way of doing data passing, triggering re-renders, serializing window state is probably the meat of the interesting work.

On top of that, you really need great UX. This is normally where projects fall short -- why should I use this solution instead of something like Tauri[2] which is excellent or Electron?

[0]: https://github.com/WebAssembly/component-model/blob/main/des...

[1]: https://github.com/WebAssembly/component-model/blob/main/des...

[2]: https://tauri.app/

Welcome to the 2nd episode of our series “Building with Tauri”, where we chat with developers who build amazing projects and products using Tauri.

Tauri seemed like the "thing" I should switch to because everybody loves Rust (heh), and because it ships significantly smaller apps.

First of all, I will be using npm as my package manager but feel free to use whatever you prefer. Find more info here.

Today I'm talking about Tauri! Do you know all the various tools that allow you to develop native applications starting from web languages? They often need an intermediate compilation, in the middle of which you end up encountering various problems not always transparent and directly solvable with a language mostly detached from native development. On the other hand, there's still the ease of developing attractive and easily usable interfaces, which are more difficult to develop with low level languages.