Inventory_Kamera VS security-code-scan

Basically, You have to scan your characters & artifacts through Inventory Kamera

Is there a tool like Inventory Kamera that can automagicly trash bad artifacts? It's a chore for me to do it manually

It's has a gnome desktop environment, which i made based on the code for this (link: https://github.com/Andrewthe13th/Inventory_Kamera)

I recommend using a optimizer to see how different your Yae would be, and see if you think it's worth pulling for C2. You can use https://github.com/Andrewthe13th/Inventory_Kamera, it scans what you have by automating mouse and keyboard, making print screens and building a txt file of what it finds. You can then upload this to a optimizer site (set speed to slow so it doesnt bug out).

There is a tool to show character profiles https://enka.network/ also there are inventory scanners like https://github.com/Andrewthe13th/Inventory_Kamera that you can use with optimizers

I use a scanner called Inventory Kamera - https://github.com/Andrewthe13th/Inventory_Kamera

4. Security code scan

Ah. So we're reaching the limits of my knowledge here, but F# was bootstrapped (written in itself) in 2006, which predates Roslyn (C#'s bootstrapping) by about ~5 years. Bootstrapping makes building code analysis tools/APIs easier. Unfortunately the F# Compiler Service and Roslyn are incompatible, and tools built in Roslyn do not work for F#. (This isn't the first time C# has taken ideas from F# but broke compatibility... Task vs Async... but I digress.) These tools include things like Security Code Scan, which I had in mind when I wrote the OP. Typically when projects say "For C# and VB.NET" they're using Roslyn (which supports VB.NET). Otherwise if they supported C#, VB.NET, and F#... they'd just say they do all of dotnet - no need to specify 2/3 languages. Microsoft's own Edit and Continue documentation follows this trend of specifying C# and VB.NET, but excluding F#.