ImageMagick VS RMagick

To tie all this together, we made an org profile for our GitHub organization page. There are some great examples of these, like Microsoft and PayPal. For Fastly's, we wanted something friendly and human so we used Imagemagick to create a montage of all the avatars of the Fastly team members who have contributed to the open source projects in our org:

Python has become a popular programming language for different applications, including data science, artificial intelligence, and web development. But, did you know creating and rendering fully customized videos with Python is also possible? At Stack Builders, we have successfully used Python libraries such as MoviePy, SciPy, and ImageMagick to generate videos with animations, text, and images. In this article, we will look closer at how Python can be used for video generation and explore some of the powerful libraries and tools that make it possible.

ImageMagick is the main tool and can do most conversions and image operations. For example to resize a whole folder of photos and convert to WebP you can do this:

Lack of open governance explains the fork in 2002. [0] The github commit history shows it's still a largely one-person-band. [1] The problems with this include a lack of succession planning, a lack of ability to scale bandwidth, and a narrower pool of ideas. The documentation website is really out-of-date as it mentions using a Borland compiler.

Alternatives to IM:

- https://www.libvips.org

- http://www.graphicsmagick.org (IM fork)

0. https://marc.info/?l=imagemagick-developer&m=104777007831767...

1. https://github.com/ImageMagick/ImageMagick

You can rotate it using https://imagemagick.org

require 'rmagick' include Magick module LambdaFunction class Handler def self.process(event:, context:) image_url = event['image_url'] my_image = ImageList.new(image_url) # TODO: Use rmagick to make your image transformations # Docs: https://rmagick.github.io { "success": true } end end end

mini_magick is much slower than YOLO. I hear that rmagick is well maintained these days, so you may want to use that.

To accomplish this project, I knew I would need some way to process the input images. Resizing the images was the easy bit. The more complex (and more important) task was to find the best way to relate a pixel's color in the source image to a dot's size in final animation. I felt that the relative luminance as described in this W3 accessibility document was a logical property to use in this case, and can be easily calculated with a color's RGB components. After determining what tasks I needed to fulfill, I determined that the RMagick library would be a good choice for this project.