IdentityServer
WPF
IdentityServer | WPF | |
---|---|---|
16 | 50 | |
1,341 | 6,827 | |
2.5% | 0.7% | |
9.4 | 9.7 | |
1 day ago | about 12 hours ago | |
JavaScript | C# | |
DUENDE™ SOFTWARE LICENSE AGREEMENT | MIT License |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
IdentityServer
-
Identity server 4
Its deprecated in favor of Duende Identityserver which introduced a license model.
-
How does cookie based authentication work?
Tokens usually have a lifetime and they are separate from the user's authentication principals like username and password. Unless you are rolling your own form of token provider (not something that would be recommended) the token creation is handled for you. Take a look at https://identityserver4.readthedocs.io/en/latest/ or if your organization makes under 1M in income a year the free version of what Identity Server progressed into https://duendesoftware.com/products/identityserver
- Ask HN: Examples of Top C# Code?
-
ImageSharp leaving the .NET Foundation due to licensing change
I think Duende (Identity Server) handled the situation pretty well.
https://duendesoftware.com/products/identityserver
> Standard License Pricing
-
Seeking people for collaboration on open source projects I started. Also open to ideas. Preferably long-term. I can help you learn and you can help me with other things, such as coding, UI and more. Beginner friendly. Safe environment.
Thanks for your message. No, the idea was not to re-implement OAuth nor OpenID stuff. What I had in mind for the authentication thingy was something like this: https://laravel.com/docs/9.x/sanctum. If we want to go the OAuth/OpenID way, in .NET we have this one: https://github.com/DuendeSoftware/IdentityServer.
- If you were tasked with implementing Identity and Access Management today, what would you do?
-
Bytebase: 20-Person Startup, 30 SaaS Services, and $1,183 Monthly Bill
> As you said, there are plenty of local options that you only need to run.
I think managed databases are a good analogy here. While I might run my own PostgreSQL/MariaDB instance, many out there won't be overjoyed at the idea of actually needing to run and manage the damned thing, as well as set up some kind of alerting and handling the need to eventually scale it up.
> It also has the largest risk of compromise and data leaking from any service you may use...
PII is definitely a big concern, even if something like password hashes aren't too useful on their own (provided that they're salted), though in cases like that it might actually make a lot of sense to utilize a widely used and tested solution that's specialized for this particular use case.
In many cases, thousands of people across the globe will be able to develop something and squash any bugs in it better than you might be able to do individually or with your own team, though there might be a few exceptions out there. Auth is probably not one of the cases where you want to write code without a lot of eyes on it.
> ...the largest amount of potential lock-in...
This is debatable: standards like OAuth2 and OIDC technically make many of the solutions and libraries way more pluggable and make it easier to choose between various implementations, depending on your needs.
Of course, something like Keycloak also has its own API (as do many of the cloud offerings) so if you build too much automation around a particular implementation, then that advantage partially goes out the window.
> ...and the least need for integration.
I'm not sure about this, it probably depends on your architecture. If you have a monolithic web app, then you probably don't need a separate turnkey/SaaS solution, whereas if you have an ever growing number of services, whilst you want to manage authentication and accounts against all of them centrally, then something like Keycloak (or one of the cloud alternatives) become way more lucrative.
That said, I'd still opt for self-hostable options whenever possible, albeit I also don't trust cloud based password managers and such, preferring something like KeePass instead. I've probably just come to a different conclusion in regards to usability/responsibility/features/security than some other people.
Sadly, there aren't that many good options out there at the moment, apart from Keycloak. For example, IdentityServer is promising, but went in a commercial direction: https://duendesoftware.com/products/identityserver#pricing
-
Why is authentication such a sh*t show with .NET 6?
He's referring to IdentityServer 3/4, which was open sourced, and was not owned by Microsoft. That 3rd party is commercializing their work (and to be fair, it's a lot of work) as https://duendesoftware.com/products/identityserver , and has a different commercial licensing model.
-
Show HN: Open-Source Identity Server Written in Go (Ory Kratos)
https://github.com/DuendeSoftware/IdentityServer/blob/main/L... does not seem to square with any definition of "open source" I'm familiar with, and that goes double for having an in-repo file that just says "read this unversioned pdf on some other site"
-
Creating JWT token auth yourself - is it secure?
I would not recommend it. There is a server named Duende identity server which you can host locally.
WPF
-
.NET 8 is on the Way! 7 Features that will blow your mind 🤯
Gear up, folks, and test drive this fresh-off-the-lab feature. And should you stumble upon any glitches along the way, don’t hesitate to reach out. Got a bug to report or feedback to give? Send them directly to our dotnet/wpf repository. We’re eager to hear from you, because together, we’re only going to make the experience even better!
- What is the best for Develop Cross-platform Application ?
-
MAUI Part 2: A New Page And Basic Styling
I did some research and did not find any proof of the EOL on WPF. In fact, Microsoft just updated the roadmap on WPF 2 months ago.
-
Avalonia UI for .NET: Project Overview from Mike James
There’s still room for improvement though. I should add, WPF on .NET Core consumes a lot of memory, due to a memory leak. It was logged by our COO as one of our users was doing a comparison.
-
VS2022 Build Error: 'Could not load file or assembly 'PresentationFramework, Version=6.0.2.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=31bf3856ad364e35'
have you tried this?
-
Duda carrera: C#/.NET vs. Node/Express
WPF: Licencia MIT.
- Help make hyphen ligatures a thing by expressing your interest in this GitHub issue
-
Just switched to this from GOG. Playnite is great, I only have one complaint...
Some added context: It's a side effect of how variable rendering works in UI library we use. There's currently sadly no way how to disable VRR compatibility, which causes the issue you describe unless you tell your GPU to not treat Playnite as VRR compatible. Some more info here.
-
Something Pretty Right: The History and Legacy of Visual Basic
WPF is definitely not dead. It may not be the latest shiny thing, but it works, it is maintained (judging by https://github.com/dotnet/wpf or https://devblogs.microsoft.com/dotnet/wpf-on-dotnet-7/), and it is fully and officially supported on the modern .NET platform.
-
WPF Begins Its Long Goodbye
This article only sights a video stream. I think part of the problem with the glacial pace of development is reliance on manual testing. See this comment:
https://github.com/dotnet/wpf/discussions/7130#discussioncom...
> Our primary goal is to ensure reduced turn-around-times for new PRs as well as clear the pending backlog of existing PRs. To that end, we are working on putting appropriate automation in place to reduce the dependency on manual testing as much as we can.
See also the recently updated WPF roadmap:
https://github.com/dotnet/wpf/blob/main/roadmap.md
If you look at the history of this file you can over the years tests have been always been in the backlog.
As for “where projects go to die”, they have 3 features planned for this year: Windows 11 Theming, a new type of folder browser, and null ability annotations. And they say they don’t think they can do them all. Maybe I’m underestimating, but that’s not a lot.
What are some alternatives?
Keycloak - Open Source Identity and Access Management For Modern Applications and Services
Introducing .NET Multi-platform App UI (MAUI) - .NET MAUI is the .NET Multi-platform App UI, a framework for building native device applications spanning mobile, tablet, and desktop.
openiddict-core - Flexible and versatile OAuth 2.0/OpenID Connect stack for .NET
Avalonia - Develop Desktop, Embedded, Mobile and WebAssembly apps with C# and XAML. The most popular .NET UI client technology
Ory Hydra - OpenID Certified™ OpenID Connect and OAuth Provider written in Go - cloud native, security-first, open source API security for your infrastructure. SDKs for any language. Works with Hardware Security Modules. Compatible with MITREid.
Flutter - Flutter makes it easy and fast to build beautiful apps for mobile and beyond
node-oidc-provider - OpenID Certified™ OAuth 2.0 Authorization Server implementation for Node.js
imgui - Dear ImGui: Bloat-free Graphical User interface for C++ with minimal dependencies
YARP - A toolkit for developing high-performance HTTP reverse proxy applications.
Extended WPF Toolkit™ - All the controls missing in WPF. Over 1 million downloads.
Hot Chocolate - Welcome to the home of the Hot Chocolate GraphQL server for .NET, the Strawberry Shake GraphQL client for .NET and Banana Cake Pop the awesome Monaco based GraphQL IDE.
Uno Platform - Build Mobile, Desktop and WebAssembly apps with C# and XAML. Today. Open source and professionally supported.