HashQL-todos-sample VS storage-foundation-api-explainer

Compare HashQL-todos-sample vs storage-foundation-api-explainer and see what are their differences.

Our great sponsors
  • SurveyJS - Open-Source JSON Form Builder to Create Dynamic Forms Right in Your App
  • WorkOS - The modern identity platform for B2B SaaS
  • InfluxDB - Power Real-Time Data Analytics at Scale
HashQL-todos-sample storage-foundation-api-explainer
1 2
13 65
- -
0.0 0.0
over 1 year ago over 2 years ago
JavaScript
- Apache License 2.0
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.

HashQL-todos-sample

Posts with mentions or reviews of HashQL-todos-sample. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2021-04-15.

storage-foundation-api-explainer

Posts with mentions or reviews of storage-foundation-api-explainer. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2021-06-14.
  • IndexedDB is completely broken in latest Safari
    10 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 14 Jun 2021
    > There's even recent work to add even higher performance APIs into the Filesystem Access API and the reception from Firefox and Safari has been positive.

    Positive as in: "FileSystem Access is a significant security risk and we're not going to implement this"? https://www.chromestatus.com/feature/6284708426022912

    Positive as in "No, we don't want fifteen different file access apis, and we don't think Storage Foundation API is going anywhere"? https://www.chromestatus.com/feature/5670244905385984

    And even though this is a draft created and authored exclusively by Googlers, even other Googlers are confused: https://github.com/WICG/storage-foundation-api-explainer/iss...

  • Don’t we all just want to use SQL on the front end?
    13 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 15 Apr 2021
    i think it's changed names (maybe) since i've last seen it? but here is the low level io spec:

    https://github.com/WICG/storage-foundation-api-explainer

What are some alternatives?

When comparing HashQL-todos-sample and storage-foundation-api-explainer you can also consider the following projects:

mingo - MongoDB query language for in-memory objects

standards-positions

postgraphile-plugin-connection-filter - Filtering on PostGraphile connections

firefox-ios - Firefox for iOS

daita - typed sql made simple

WebKit - Home of the WebKit project, the browser engine used by Safari, Mail, App Store and many other applications on macOS, iOS and Linux.

supabase - The open source Firebase alternative.

pgress - Native PostgreSQL JavaScript client library for web browsers

datsync - Datomic <-> DataScript syncing/replication utilities