HAIL-CAESAR VS cellular-automaton.nvim

EDIT: Already proposed solutions are " CAESAR-Lisflood" ( https://github.com/dvalters/HAIL-CAESAR ) and "SIBERIA" ( https://csdms.colorado.edu/wiki/Model:SIBERIA ), but both are difficult to use and have steep learning curves. I've also found the GRASS module "r.landscape.evol" ( https://grass.osgeo.org/grass78/manuals/addons/r.landscape.evol.html ), but this one seems even more complicated to use. So I'm open to easier alternatives. It would also be interesting if someone with the experiencein this could compare the proposed solutions (advantages/disadvantages, compare difficulty of use, ...).

Any idea which model would be best? For CAESAR-Lisflood there exists a derived HAIL-CAESAR model that has an easier to use GUI ( https://github.com/dvalters/HAIL-CAESAR ), and there seems to be at east some info and support available online. But for SIBERIA I can't find anything besides this: https://csdms.colorado.edu/wiki/Model:SIBERIA.

The animations included in cellular-automaton.nvim hide the buffer contents fairly well, I think

cellular-automaton.nvim

I had some fun with Eandrju/cellular-automaton.nvim. I cheated a little and made the comments blend with the background for the smiley.

Hey, few weeks ago I happened to play a bit with cellular automaton animations (falling sand, game of life etc). At the same time I was looking for an idea for a neovim plugin, as I wanted to dive into lua and vim plugin development. I had this silly idea, that neovim's buffer is already a 2D grid and could be used as an initial seed for those animations. As stupid and useless it sounds, I had a lot of fun implementing it :) eandrju/cellular-automaton.nvim - "A useless plugin that might help you cope with stubbornly broken tests or overall lack of sense in life. It lets you execute aesthetically pleasing, cellular automaton animations based on the content of neovim buffer."