Gramformer VS plotnine

You could spin up an instance with something like https://github.com/PrithivirajDamodaran/Gramformer and then just run the entries threw it.

A paraphraser for any input text using the wonderful parrot library from https://github.com/PrithivirajDamodaran

Gramformer can be useful.

If you capture it, you might as well correct it. Check out Gramformer or Grammarly's Gector. You can do scoring based on number of mistakes proposed by these models i.e. the fewer, the better.

To your last point, have you tried plotnine? It's meant to be ggplot2 for python.

https://github.com/has2k1/plotnine

plotnine - A grammar of graphics for Python based on ggplot2.

Github: https://github.com/has2k1/plotnine

This seems quite similar to plotnine [0], which also provides a grammar of graphics interface for Python. That said, I love ggplot and I can't wait to use this in my research! I hope we can port/re-implement ggthemes, scientificplots [1], and other ggplot libraries for lets-plot.

0: https://plotnine.readthedocs.io/en/stable/

1: https://github.com/garrettj403/SciencePlots

There is [plotnine](https://plotnine.readthedocs.io/en/stable/) which tries to implement ggplot in Python.

You could use plotnine if you like the grammar of graphics concept: https://plotnine.readthedocs.io/en/stable/

> Python doesn’t yet have anything remotely close to ggplot for rapidly making exploratory graphics, for example.

Plug for plotnine (https://plotnine.readthedocs.io/en/stable/). I don't know R but use ggplot indirectly through this library for exploratory data analysis, and comparing the experience to any other python plotting library, I understand why R folks are usually so sad to be using Python.

They have, https://plotnine.readthedocs.io/en/stable/