Github-Ranking
errcheck
Github-Ranking | errcheck | |
---|---|---|
15 | 9 | |
5,313 | 2,284 | |
- | - | |
9.5 | 6.3 | |
4 days ago | 19 days ago | |
Python | Go | |
MIT License | MIT License |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
Github-Ranking
- GitHub Ranking: Top Stars Projects
-
Awesome Lists is the GitHub side you probably never heard of, but you should definitely have a look!
5th highest number of stars of any repo on GitHub 🙃
- Ask HN: Why are so many PHP projects moving to Node?
-
Why are haskell applications so obscure?
This explains the uneven distribution of Haskell applications, but this does not explain why the distribution is more even in other languages. But is that even the case? You mention Python, and Python happens to be THE language of choice for data science projects, so I would expect to also see an uneven distribution there. And Java happens to be THE language of choice for writing Android applications, so I would expect an uneven distribution there too. And Rust is a systems programming language, so I would expect games and other things that really need to run fast. Let's look at lists of popular projects by language:
- Github Ranking: Github stars and forks ranking list. Github Top100 stars list of different languages. Automatically update daily.
-
My First Blog
The repo I chose was Github-Ranking, a repo to check the most starred and forked GitHub repos of the day. The link can be found here: https://github.com/EvanLi/Github-Ranking. I picked this repo because I've never explored the most popular repos before and this allowed me to see what a lot of people are working on.
- RustDesk ranks among top Rust open source projects now
- Top 10 Rust OSS projects updated
-
Benefits of React JS
Clocking in at 190K Github stars React's github ranking is easily ranked in the top 10.
-
Why We Switched from Python to Go
Here's a few other tools that are written in Perl, sorted by GitHub popularity: https://github.com/EvanLi/Github-Ranking/blob/master/Top100/...
Actually, that repo has lists like this for most languages: https://github.com/EvanLi/Github-Ranking
errcheck
-
Linter to check for errors ignored with _
In our codebase I noticed a few cases where people ignored errors returned from functions by assigning them to _, ie result, _ := foo(). The errcheck linter doesn't seem to catch this, does anyone know of a linter that does?
-
Golang panics in libraries
And we also expect that the caller will check the error and handle it. There is a popular linter that checks it for us: errcheck.
-
Is it a bad convention to overwrite err variable?
You should be using golangci-lint, because all serious Go programmers should. golangci-lint contains errcheck, which will detect if you overwrite an error without having done something with it in the meantime. I consider this one of the most important linters (this doesn't just detect things that may sorta kinda someday turn into bugs, this quite likely is a bug RIGHT NOW), and it helps you have the confidence you can overwrite errors as you go and don't need to keep allocating new ones.
-
Integration Tests failing
Run golangci-lint over your code if you haven't already and pay special attention to errcheck's output.
-
Luciano Remes | Golang is 𝘼𝙡𝙢𝙤𝙨𝙩 Perfect
errcheck has a flag for that ;)
-
Proposal: Go 2: Lightweight anonymous function syntax
https://github.com/kisielk/errcheck, which is in most of the combined linter packages by default.
We'll agree to disagree about unused imports; imports have can side-effects.
-
Lies we tell ourselves to keep using Golang
I prefer functions returning errors over throwing exceptions. Whether it's Go's errors or ML-style options/results, they're both better than exceptions. I cannot remember the last time I had a bug from not checking an error in Go. There's also errcheck which I use as part of my linting that will catch unchecked errors, such that I cannot even commit the code.
-
I Want Off Mr. Golang's Wild Ride
> Go compiler raise an error if a variable (error) goes unused
It doesn't though. It's perfectly valid to not use the return value of a function that only returns an error, for instance.
There are static error checking tools you can use like https://github.com/kisielk/errcheck to work around this, but most people don't use them.
I've run into a lack of Go error checking many times. Many times it's just the trivial case, where the compiler doesn't warn about not checking the result of an error-returning function.
But often it'll be subtler, and the result of Go's API design. One example is its file writing API, which requires you to close the file and check its error to be correct. Many times people will just `defer file.Close()`, but that isn't good enough - you're ignoring the error there.
Worse still is e.g: writing to a file through a bufio.Writer. To be correct, you need to remember to flush the writer, check that error, then close the file and check that error. There's no type-level support to make sure you do that.
-
Trying Out Generics in Go
I'd be really happy with that! Building the functionality of errcheck[1] and ineffassign[2] into the compiler — or at the very least, into govet — would go a long way to allay my worries with Go.
I think the reason they don't do this is that it's a slight (albeit a very tiny one) against Go's philosophy of errors being values, just like any other. While the `error` type is standard and used throughout Go source code, it still just has a simple three-line definition[3] and is not treated as a special case anywhere else; there is nothing stopping you from returning your own error type if you wish. A third-party linter could simply check for the `error` type specifically, but the first-party tools should not, and there's nothing like Rust's `#[must_use]` attribute that could be used instead. I respect Go's philosophy, but I feel like pragmatism must win in this case.
[1]: https://github.com/kisielk/errcheck
What are some alternatives?
OnlyFans - Scrape all the media from an OnlyFans account - Updated regularly
GoLint - [mirror] This is a linter for Go source code. (deprecated)
transformers - 🤗 Transformers: State-of-the-art Machine Learning for Pytorch, TensorFlow, and JAX.
staticcheck
CSrankings - A web app for ranking computer science departments according to their research output in selective venues, and for finding active faculty across a wide range of areas.
gosimple
tailwind-nextjs-starter-blog - This is a Next.js, Tailwind CSS blogging starter template. Comes out of the box configured with the latest technologies to make technical writing a breeze. Easily configurable and customizable. Perfect as a replacement to existing Jekyll and Hugo individual blogs.
gcvis - Visualise Go program GC trace data in real time
aur - A secure, multilingual package manager for Arch Linux and the AUR.
apicompat - apicompat checks recent changes to a Go project for backwards incompatible changes
gtunnel - Tunnel is a clean wrapper around native Go channel to allow cleanly closing the channel without throwing a panic.
Go Metalinter