GHSA-pjwm-rvh2-c87w
xUnit
GHSA-pjwm-rvh2-c87w | xUnit | |
---|---|---|
8 | 36 | |
- | 4,028 | |
- | 0.7% | |
- | 9.2 | |
- | 2 days ago | |
C# | ||
- | GNU General Public License v3.0 or later |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
GHSA-pjwm-rvh2-c87w
-
Attack Simulator for SolarWinds, Codecov, and ua-parser-js breaches
The SUNSPOT malware, Codecov breach, and lot of compromised open-source packages (like was the case with ua-parser-js) target the CI/ CD pipeline to modify release build or exfiltrate credentials.
- Embedded malware in ua-parser-js - critical severity
- Embedded malware in ua-parser-JS (NPM package)
-
PSA: Tor.com was hacked and is currently spreading malware
I think you are misunderstanding the attack vector in the article you linked. This isn't the same thing we were discussing, please see https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-pjwm-rvh2-c87w. This was not a compromise designed to go after the visitors of the website so far as I can tell (and even if it were, it couldn't do much except possibly steal a password if you entered it on a compromised site or steal cookie data). This was designed to target people who were using the library in their software, aka, it was targeting the build-chain of the developers, and many devs and companies as a result had computers compromised when the updated their versions, which caused the compromised version to download to their computers.
- Supply-chain attack on NPM Package UAParser, which has millions of daily downloads
- The npm package ua-parser-js had three versions (0.7.29, 0.8.0, 1.0.0) published with malicious code.
- Embedded crypto miner in ua-parser-JS
-
BREAKING!! NPM package ‘ua-parser-js’ with more than 7M weekly download is compromised
Github has published an advisory for the package https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-pjwm-rvh2-c87w
xUnit
-
Optimizing C# code analysis for quicker .NET compilation
Several well-known NuGet packages such as xUnit.net, FluentAssertions, StyleCop, Entity Framework Core, and others include by default a significant number of Roslyn analyzers. They help you adhere to the conventions and best practices of these libraries.
-
Integration testing in Umbraco 10+: Validating document types
Most of my rules apply to document types, so let's build some tests for document types. We start by creating a new test class and a new test function and getting a list of all document types. This test is created using xUnit and FluentAssertions:
-
Comprehensive Unit Testing: A Line-by-Line Approach
xUnit -> https://xunit.net/
-
CI/CD Pipeline Using GitHub Actions: Automate Software Delivery
.NET / xUnit / NUnit / MSTest
-
Fluent Assertions: Fluently Assert the Result of .NET Tests
This library extends the traditional assertions provided by frameworks like MSTest, NUnit, or XUnit by offering a more extensive set of extension methods. Fluent Assertions supports a wide range of types like collections, strings, and objects and even allows for more advanced assertions like throwing exceptions.
-
FluentValidation in .NET
You can verify the functionality of this validator by writing the following tests (using xUnit):
-
Running a XUnit test with C#?
The git repo has other runners. AssemblyRunner appears to be the best fit for an already compiled tests project, but there is a runner that can be wrapped into an MSBuild task for example.
-
Setting up a simple testing project with C#
At this point you're going to see a familiar screen asking you to select a project. Here we're looking for a test project. By default, Visual Studio gives you access to 3 different testing frameworks based on your choice of project. These are MSTest, XUnit and NUnit. Ultimately, all 3 of these testing accomplish the same thing, and I've worked with all of them at various points in my career. The difference is mainly in exact syntax and documentation. Although, it's generally considered that MSTest is a little "older" than NUnit or XUnit, so I tend to see it less now. For the purposes of this demo, I'm going to go with NUnit:
-
Integration tests for AWS serverless solution
xUnit unit tests tool
-
Test-Driven Development
Use a testing framework: Utilize a testing framework like NUnit, xUnit, or MSTest to create, organize, and run your tests. These frameworks provide a consistent way to write tests, generate test reports, and integrate with continuous integration tools.
What are some alternatives?
npm-force-resolutions - Force npm to install a specific transitive dependency version
Shouldly - Should testing for .NET—the way assertions should be!
micromatch - Highly optimized wildcard and glob matching library. Faster, drop-in replacement to minimatch and multimatch. Used by square, webpack, babel core, yarn, jest, ract-native, taro, bulma, browser-sync, stylelint, nyc, ava, and many others! Follow micromatch's author: https://github.com/jonschlinkert
NUnit - NUnit Framework
is-mobile - Check if mobile browser, based on useragent string.
Fluent Assertions - A very extensive set of extension methods that allow you to more naturally specify the expected outcome of a TDD or BDD-style unit tests. Targets .NET Framework 4.7, as well as .NET Core 2.1, .NET Core 3.0, .NET 6, .NET Standard 2.0 and 2.1. Supports the unit test frameworks MSTest2, NUnit3, XUnit2, MSpec, and NSpec3.
is-number - JavaScript/Node.js utility. Returns `true` if the value is a number or string number. Useful for checking regex match results, user input, parsed strings, etc.
Moq - Repo for managing Moq 4.x [Moved to: https://github.com/moq/moq]
Dapper - Dapper - a simple object mapper for .Net [Moved to: https://github.com/DapperLib/Dapper]
NSubstitute - A friendly substitute for .NET mocking libraries.
MSTest - MSTest framework and adapter