FluentResults
ECMAScript 6 compatibility table
Our great sponsors
FluentResults | ECMAScript 6 compatibility table | |
---|---|---|
10 | 33 | |
1,643 | 4,406 | |
- | 0.2% | |
0.0 | 6.0 | |
5 months ago | 3 days ago | |
C# | HTML | |
MIT License | GNU General Public License v3.0 or later |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
FluentResults
-
The Monad Invasion - Part 1: What's a Monad?
FluentResults
-
FluentResults: Simplificando el Manejo de Resultados y Errores en Aplicaciones .NET
altmann/FluentResults: A generalised Result object implementation for .NET/C# (github.com)
-
TypeScript Is Surprisingly OK for Compilers
Or maybe just start using Results as return type and get ValueOrDefault :) But when it comes to handling exceptions, I think it explodes there with ifs and processing IENumerables: https://github.com/altmann/FluentResults
But then again, simpler Results wrapper may be used perhaps. But it is a different way of coding and takes some mental shift on how to think about errors and distinguish between error results and true exceptions.
https://github.com/altmann/FluentResults
-
Exception handling between controller and service
Yep, it's called result pattern, aforementioned above. There was two highlighted implementations - OneOf, FluentResults.
-
Communication - library for Results
What does this library do better or differently than something like Fluent Results?
-
Why is using Exceptions is controversial in low level languages (like C++) but not in C#?
For C# particular - this project https://github.com/altmann/FluentResults
-
Knowledge of generics: isn't it pretty common?
For example https://github.com/altmann/FluentResults is excellent if you want generic results
-
The Operation Result Pattern
It's worth noting that there's also a library called FluentResults as an alternative to this one.
-
Introducing Cranks.Result
Interesting... I just found out that your first intention was to improve FluentResults but your PR got rejected which is a pity. PR: https://github.com/altmann/FluentResults/pull/80. I guess I will have a look at your library in hopes of removing some boilerplate code. Thanks!
ECMAScript 6 compatibility table
-
TypeScript Is Surprisingly OK for Compilers
http://kangax.github.io/compat-table/es6/
This page lists features from es6 (and newer versions linked at the top) along with compliance to the spec. First column is the current browser, second is babel+corejs polyfills.
Overall, babel gets about 70% of the way there.
- Яндекс Браузер не переводит видео про обучение украинских танкистов, хотя другие видео с канала МО Британии переводит нормально
-
Brett Slatkin: Why am I building a new functional programming language?
Case in point: Tail Call Optimization has been part of the JS spec since ES6, but remains completely unimplemented in all mainstream browsers/engines besides Safari[1]. For all but the most predictable inputs, you're pretty much forced to use loops where recursion would otherwise be preferable.
Additional case in point: async Iterables cannot be processed as a piped stream. You must use the for await construct, which is a shame considering the FP niceties that the Array type already provides for more traditional lists. Once again, you are forced to use an imperative construct unless you specifically want to defeat the purpose of using an Iterable in the first place by trying to convert it into an Array (... and potentially choking in the process, I might add!).
[1]: https://kangax.github.io/compat-table/es6/
- [AskJS] Is there a detailed comparison chart that shows what's supported in JavaScript ES5 versus ES6?
-
A single developer has been maintaining core.js with little recognition or support. Almost all modern single page apps use core.js. Millions of downloads and hardly any compensation
Eventually the browsers started racing to near-full ES6 compatibility. I remember following ES6 progress in realtime with articles and with compatibility tables http://kangax.github.io/compat-table/es6/ . But many people are acting like that either didn't happen, or like it was a one and done thing (despite the ESNext naming shift to avoid the focus on numbers). So we see people just hand-waving away the importance of polyfills like in this gem:
-
Tell HN: Firefox Is an awesome browser right now
> https://kangax.github.io/compat-table/es6/
Oh man this was a rough one both for FF and Chrome but Chrome did perform better slightly on cursory glance.
Thanks for providing these links, they're definitely a good rule of thumb benchmarks to test new browsers
-
My 1st website "Claw Man" written in javascript
Javascript / CSS language syntax: can see availability for Javascript here - https://kangax.github.io/compat-table/es6/
-
Is there any legitimate reasons for the javascript hate?
I say this as a JS user, but there is no singular JavaScript (realistically, it's not even JavaScript but instead ECMAScript). There is no one place to go that lays out all of what the language can or can't do the way PHP and Python do. The ECMAScript board makes recommendations, then the browsers and runtimes implement features of the recommendations. This site does a good job laying out which features are implemented for browsers and runtimes based on the flavor of the ECMAScript standard. This unique experience can be especially frustrating for someone learning JavaScript and coming from another language that does not have this problem.
- JS Polyfills - Part 1
-
[AskJS] Is there a JavaScript library that will test all ES features on your browser and tell you which it supports and which it doesn't?
https://kangax.github.io/compat-table/es6/ has a column for "current browser"
What are some alternatives?
Result - A result abstraction that can be mapped to HTTP response codes if needed.
es6-features - ECMAScript 6: Feature Overview & Comparison
Cranks.Result - A simple, strongly typed and boilerplate poor implementation of the Result pattern.
Babel (Formerly 6to5) - 🐠 Babel is a compiler for writing next generation JavaScript.
tweetinvi - Tweetinvi, an intuitive Twitter C# library for the REST and Stream API. It supports .NET, .NETCore, UAP (Xamarin)...
Traceur compiler - Traceur is a JavaScript.next-to-JavaScript-of-today compiler
sendgrid-csharp - The Official Twilio SendGrid C#, .NetStandard, .NetCore API Library
es6-cheatsheet - ES2015 [ES6] cheatsheet containing tips, tricks, best practices and code snippets
excepticon-dotnet - Excepticon SDK for .NET
es6features - Overview of ECMAScript 6 features
CSharpFunctionalExtensions - Functional extensions for C#
Lebab - Turn your ES5 code into readable ES6. Lebab does the opposite of what Babel does.