FlareSolverr VS unbound-docker

What i didnt tried: - scraping and using these (single page) tokens - headless browser - web-test-frameworks like selenium (programmable browser) - using Flaresolver (my best bet) https://github.com/FlareSolverr/FlareSolverr . A headless browser / proxy developed to bypass cloudflare. You can easily deploy it onprem with docker. I know google got its own defence machanisms, but i've got very good experience using it for scraping and crawling (at least cloudflare protected) websites. So i guess its very good at pretending being a normal browser, being a normal user.

Prowlarr & Flaresolverr to handle indexers for Radarr/Sonarr.

In terms of rate limiting and IP bans there is always that possibility on a VPN and it does happen but that's the great thing about VPNs is you can always just swap servers. On an automated server like a nas, a server restart will take care of this issue but of course until that happens some indexers may have issues. But the great thing is we have things like flaresolverr now which can mitigate these rate limit and captcha issues with various websites and I highly recommend people take a some time to set it up. How I see it if you are using a residential IP that never changes, the risk of rate limiting or IP bans becomes more of an issue because it is longer lasting or permanent. So in my opinion the security and privacy benefits of a VPN outweighs the possibility of some minor hiccups.

gtthub

FlareSolverr est un serveur proxy permettant de contourner la protection de Cloudflare. gtthub

https://github.com/FlareSolverr/FlareSolverr Had to do a fair bit of debugging to find the code level changes, but you just have to update two sections.

You could also use a Cloudflare bypass tool like FlareSolverr, which is a proxy server you can use to bypass Cloudflare and DDoS-GUARD protection.

version: "3" # More info at https://github.com/pi-hole/docker-pi-hole/ and https://docs.pi-hole.net/ networks: dns_net: driver: bridge ipam: config: - subnet: 10.2.0.0/24 services: pihole: depends_on: [unbound] container_name: pihole image: pihole/pihole:latest hostname: pihole networks: dns_net: ipv4_address: 10.2.0.100 ports: - "5335:53/tcp" - "5335:53/udp" - "7000:80/tcp" environment: TZ: ${TZ} WEBPASSWORD: ${PWD} FTLCONF_LOCAL_IPV4: ${HOST_IP} # Set to server's LAN IP, used by web block modes. PIHOLE_DNS_: 10.2.0.200 # Upstream DNS server(s) for Pi-hole to forward queries to, separated by a semicolon DNSMASQ_LISTENING: all # "Listen on all interfaces, permit all origins" # Volumes store your data between container upgrades volumes: - /var/lib/docker/volumes/pihole/etc-pihole:/etc/pihole - /var/lib/docker/volumes/pihole/etc-dnsmasq.d:/etc/dnsmasq.d healthcheck: disable: true restart: unless-stopped unbound: # https://github.com/MatthewVance/unbound-docker container_name: unbound image: mvance/unbound:latest hostname: unbound networks: dns_net: ipv4_address: 10.2.0.200 ports: - "${HOST_IP}:53:53/udp" - "${HOST_IP}:53:53/tcp" healthcheck: disable: true restart: unless-stopped

I'm not an unbound expert, but as far as I understand MatthewVance's image, unbound is already configured properly: https://github.com/MatthewVance/unbound-docker/blob/master/1.17.1/data/unbound.sh. I didn't want to go into detail how pi-hole or unbound works, since I think there is enough documentation on that.

I am successfully running pihole on a different machine, but am planning to migrate to a new docker host. I figured this would be a good time to configure pihole with unbound. I am attempting to run unbound in a docker container running on Opensuse leap and I am using this docker image.

You can also use Unbound for recursive DNS in a docker container: https://github.com/MatthewVance/unbound-docker

https://github.com/MatthewVance/unbound-docker/blob/master/1.14.0/data/unbound.sh

# https://github.com/MatthewVance/unbound-docker unbound: container_name: unbound environment: PGID: $PGID PUID: $PUID TZ: $TZ image: mvance/unbound networks: smarthome: ipv4_address: 172.18.0.6 restart: always