ExpensiveOptimBenchmark VS Hyperactive

Compare ExpensiveOptimBenchmark vs Hyperactive and see what are their differences.

InfluxDB - Power Real-Time Data Analytics at Scale
Get real-time insights from all types of time series data with InfluxDB. Ingest, query, and analyze billions of data points in real-time with unbounded cardinality.
www.influxdata.com
featured
SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews
SaaSHub helps you find the best software and product alternatives
www.saashub.com
featured
ExpensiveOptimBenchmark Hyperactive
1 8
19 490
- -
3.9 7.7
7 months ago 5 months ago
Python Python
MIT License MIT License
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.

ExpensiveOptimBenchmark

Posts with mentions or reviews of ExpensiveOptimBenchmark. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2022-07-14.
  • 29 Python real world optimization tutorials
    2 projects | /r/optimization | 14 Jul 2022
    For the problems with continous decision variables it is not trivial to come up with faster approaches on a modern many-core CPU. But even with discrete input (scheduling and planning) new continous optimizers can compete. The trick is to utilize parallel optimization runs and numba to perform around 1E6 fitness evaluations each second. Advantage is that it is much easier to create a fitness function than for instance to implement incremental score calculation in Optaplanner. And it is more flexible if you have to handle non-standard problems. For very expensive optimizations (like https://github.com/AlgTUDelft/ExpensiveOptimBenchmark) parallelization of fitness evaluation is more important than to use surrogate models.

Hyperactive

Posts with mentions or reviews of Hyperactive. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2021-03-12.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing ExpensiveOptimBenchmark and Hyperactive you can also consider the following projects:

fast-cma-es - A Python 3 gradient-free optimization library

mango - Parallel Hyperparameter Tuning in Python

parmoo - Python library for parallel multiobjective simulation optimization

pybobyqa - Python-based Derivative-Free Optimization with Bound Constraints

opytimizer - 🐦 Opytimizer is a Python library consisting of meta-heuristic optimization algorithms.

OpenMetadata - Open Standard for Metadata. A Single place to Discover, Collaborate and Get your data right.

optuna-examples - Examples for https://github.com/optuna/optuna

optimization-tutorial - Tutorials for the optimization techniques used in Gradient-Free-Optimizers and Hyperactive.

anovos - Anovos - An Open Source Library for Scalable feature engineering Using Apache-Spark

Auto_ViML - Automatically Build Multiple ML Models with a Single Line of Code. Created by Ram Seshadri. Collaborators Welcome. Permission Granted upon Request.

Gradient-Free-Optimizers - Simple and reliable optimization with local, global, population-based and sequential techniques in numerical discrete search spaces.

bytehub - ByteHub: making feature stores simple