qtile VS virt-manager

Hello! I have been having some trouble installing the Qtile community edition on my machine. I have cloned the repo from here and made sure all the dependencies were installed.

The qtile community edition packages are listed at https://github.com/EndeavourOS-Community-Editions/qtile/blob/main/packages-repository.txt and is relatively simple

You made me curious about the Arco Qtile config. https://github.com/arcolinux/arcolinux-qtile and for comparison https://github.com/EndeavourOS-Community-Editions/qtile

If all you want from endeavourOS is their theming, you could just check their Qtile configuration on Github

I'm using endeavourOS and currently using their default config

libvirt is a C library developped by RedHat under the terms of the GNU LGPL license, that provides a generic API that abstracts the bits and bytes of the underlying hypervisor, networking and storage technologies. Using libvirt generic API permits to benefit from a large ecosystem of open source software and tools. As an example, it is possible to use the virt-manager client to create and manage virtual machines. It supports a wide range of hypervisors including Xen via the libxl driver, KVM, BHyve, Hyper-V and storage backends, including ZFS.

# https://github.com/virt-manager/virt-manager/issues/445

There's also virt-install, which is part of the Virt Manager package. https://github.com/virt-manager/virt-manager/blob/main/man/v...

  curl --output-dir $HOME/.local/share/libvirt/images/ -LO https://cloud.debian.org/images/cloud/bookworm/20240507-1740/debian-12-genericcloud-arm64-20240507-1740.qcow2

It's still being updated. I don't see anything on the virt-manager homepage or GitHub that would suggest it is deprecated.

https://virt-manager.org/

https://github.com/virt-manager/virt-manager

It can't do literally everything Qemu/libvirt can do using only the UI, but given that it has escape hatches to directly edit libvirt configurations, and libvirt has escape hatches to directly pass arguments to Qemu, there's very little you can't do with it.

I would love to see a serious comparison (features & performance) between VMWare ESXi, Proxmox VE and let's say a more stock RHEL or Ubuntu. And maybe even include FreeBSD/bhyve.

Because yes, in terms of core functionality it should be in the same ballpark. And in terms of UI, Virtual Machine Manager [0] was not that bad.

[0] https://virt-manager.org/

Shout out to https://virt-manager.org/ - works much better for me, supports running qemu on remote systems via ssh. I used to use this all the time for managing bunches of disparate vm hosts and local vms.

If not, I would just run a CentOS Stream 8 virtual machine using either GNOME Boxes or virt-manager, and set up networking and ssh so you can access the database from the host.

https://virt-manager.org/ <- Recommend this as Front-end

I'd say it is half-baked webmin. You can only use it with NetworkManager, and if you have an even remotely complex network setup for VMs, NetworkManager usually must be turned off, which makes Cockpit practically unusable. virt-manager [1] is way more powerful for those who like managing VMs with GUI.

[1] https://virt-manager.org/