DomTerm VS sycamore-mac

Completion for program P should be written and maintained by the "owner" of program P - and installed with program P. This is of course difficult when there are many different "shells" that each have their own "language" for specifying completions. A multi-shell completion library can help with this problem.

To me it make sense that completion for program P should be handled by program P itself. That way, completions are unlikely to get out of sync with the application, and the completion handler can use the same option parser as the application. A way to do this is to use a special "hidden" switch to request completion.

Specifically the DomTerm terminal emulator (https://domterm.org) handles its own completions. Bash allows you to register a command that handles completions for some other command. The following tells bash that to handle completions for the domterm command it should call domterm with the magic "#complete-for-bash" option followed by the existing line and position.

    complete -o nospace -C 'domterm "#complete-for-bash" "$COMP_LINE" "$COMP_POINT"' domterm

Sixel has the one advantage of being mplemented in xterm and a modest number of other terminals. Otherwise, it's a pretty bad format: Inefficient. Unclear and inconsistently implemented specification. All images have to be a multiple fof 6 pixel rows, which may not align with either image height or character height.

Some terminal implement some other protocols, but attempts to specify a standard have failed. There are some tricky issues, such as: When does an image or part of an image get erased? Can you write text on top of an image and if so how are they aligned? What happens if you write an image on top of existing text? On top of an existing image? How does scrolling affect things? What happens to the image on window resize or zoom? Can you reliably update part of an image?

DomTerm (https://domterm.org) supports images in two ways:

If interested in enhanced terminals, please take a look at DomTerm (https://domterm.org). It too optionally uses Tauri/Wry, though it can also also Electron, Qt, or a plain web-browser. You can embed images and rich text among other feayrures. DomTerm also has builtin tmux-like panes+tabs (mouse-draggable), detachable sessions, and a powerful "view" (selection) mode.

bash-preexec.sh and shell-integration.bash are copied from another terminal called DomTerm (that also offers click to position cursor) into ~/.local/share/DomTerm. Those files can be found here.

For people using or considering Mosh or Eternal Terminal: I'd love if you could try DomTerm (https://domterm.org). Specifically DomTerm's support for stable remote connections - see https://domterm.org/Remoting-over-ssh.html .

DomTerm (https://domterm.org) isn't quite what you asked for: It only indirectly has a JavaScript console: Since its frontend is a browser engine, you can open up a JavaScript debugger.

DomTerm (https://domterm.org) attempts to provide similar possibilities as TermKit. However, it starts with the position that it should also (and perhaps first) be a fully-functional modern mostly-xterm-compatible terminal emulator. On top of that we add rich html text, images, logical structure, "shell integrayion", and more.

DomTerm - JavaScript, Electron, Qt - Web browser, Linux (+ others?)

DomTerm (https://domterm.org) uses the Golden Layout library (https://github.com/golden-layout/golden-layout). As far as I can tell, this does everything mentioned in the article. It also supports tabs, and you can also reposition terminal windows by dragging, neither of which I saw mentioned in the article. (I'm currently working on being able to drag between top-level windows. It sort-of-works, but only at the proof-of-concept level.)

Please try DomTerm (https://domterm.org). The 2.9.4 AppImage (https://github.com/PerBothner/DomTerm/releases/tag/2.9.4) should have the needed support for grapheme clusters and hopefully work on reasonably up-to-date Linux systems. Of course there are more recent fixes and improvements if you don't mind building from source.

Not inherently, but practically yes – currently. There are attempts to use it for desktop ui https://github.com/Submersible/sycamore-mac but in general nothing prevents you from using it as you like and implement a backend you need.

Sycamore. And before people start complaining that it's just a webview or a browser in disguise, I would like to add that Sycamore was built from the start to allow multiple render backends. Right now, there are only backends for DOM and SSR (Server Side Rendering) but it should be pretty easy to extend it to native UI frameworks. In fact, there is a POC here of Sycamore running on macOS: https://github.com/Submersible/sycamore-mac although it is right now far from usable.

I used this a bit, it was really great. Writing a Rust backend & exposing it to TypeScript was really slick!

There was one issue I ran into that made me think about jumping to Electron mid project, but I can't remember what it was now, but I think it was something like making my app bleed the entire MacOS window while still being moveable.

The other downside is you're going to be tempted to go down the rabbit hole and do everything in Rust. [1]

[1] https://github.com/Submersible/sycamore-mac