lips
Litecoin Improvement Proposals. See https://github.com/bitcoin/bips (by DavidBurkett)
ltc-release-builder
By DavidBurkett
| lips | ltc-release-builder | |
|---|---|---|
| 24 | 1 | |
| 2 | 3 | |
| - | - | |
| 0.0 | 3.4 | |
| over 1 year ago | 2 months ago | |
| Python | ||
| - | - |
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
lips
Posts with mentions or reviews of lips.
We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives
and similar projects. The last one was on 2022-05-06.
- Mimblewimble Progress Update Thread - April
- Mimblewimble Progress Update Thread - March
- Mimblewimble Progress Update Thread - February
- Mimblewimble Progress Update Thread - January
- Mimblewimble Progress Update Thread - December
-
Mimblewimble?
Looking at the situation I came to suspect that /u/tevador 's proposal and what Litecoin actually implemented now are two quite different things. Their proposal for non-interactive transactions does not credit or even mention Tevador.
- MWEB - information for users and developers?
-
Mimblewimble Progress Update Thread - November
The need for a more formally documented design became evident, so I spent the next few weeks rewriting LIP-0004 into a more complete and formally specified design, making minor tweaks along the way to harden it where I could. Clearly, I should’ve done this from the beginning, because we’ve had nearly as many reviewers of LIP-0004 in this past month as we have for the previous 1.5 years 🙂
-
@DavidBurkett38: 1/10 - Some important news about MWEB. This will be included in tonight's monthly update as well, but I wanted to share here for a little more visibility.
9/10 I'll provide all of the details about how we fixed it as part of tonight's MWEB update. LIP-0004 (https://github.com/DavidBurkett/lips/blob/master/lip-0004.mediawiki) is no longer vulnerable, and the code will be soon changed to match the LIP.
ltc-release-builder
Posts with mentions or reviews of ltc-release-builder.
We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives
and similar projects. The last one was on 2021-12-03.
-
Mimblewimble Progress Update Thread - November
I mentioned last month that the release build process was time-consuming, and the scripts were outdated, so I spent some time cleaning all of the old scripts up, and creating a simpler, more automated build process. The build scripts and verification keys are going to be maintained in a separate repo going forward. Right now, the new ltc-release-builder is just under my personal github account, but if it works out well for the MWEB release, we’ll get that moved to litecoin’s github org.
What are some alternatives?
When comparing lips and ltc-release-builder you can also consider the following projects:
litecoin
bips - Bitcoin Improvement Proposals
lips - Litecoin Improvement Proposals. See https://github.com/bitcoin/bips
litecoin - Litecoin source tree
libmw
GrinPlusPlusUI