DALLE-mtf VS gpt-2

This vision is in line with EleutherAI, a non-profit organization founded in July 2020 by a group of researchers. Driven by the perceived opacity and the challenge of reproducibility in AI, their goal was to create leading open-source language models.

My current idea is to utilize the EleutherAI pythia (Databricks Dolly). I would like to know whether translating the Dolly-15k dataset into the desired language using state-of-the-art translation techniques like DeepL would be a viable approach to fine-tune the Pythia base model. I want to use this model for semantic search, so perfection is not a necessity.

There are open source AI efforts, like EleutherAI. Needless to say, they are lagging behind big players, but it's better than nothing.

The new GPT 3.5 isn't aware what are GPT-3.5 or davinci-002 (repeatable) and claimed that it was designed by EleutherAI and has only 6 bil parameters (wasn't been able to repeat but didn't really try).

Hi, my name is Stella Biderman and I run EleutherAI, the one of the foremost non-profit research institutes in the world that trains and studies large language models. I have been involved with the majority of models to hold the title “largest open source GPT model in the world” and have dabbled in exploring using plagiarism detection tools to identify code written by GPT-J.

dolly-v2-12bis a 12 billion parameter causal language model created by Databricks that is derived from EleutherAI’s Pythia-12b and fine-tuned on a ~15K record instruction corpus generated by Databricks employees and released under a permissive license (CC-BY-SA)

It is true that Emad needs to find an appropriate business model. The good news is that the hype is still undergoing. I'm sure that Emad can grab another round of liquidity injection. He got plenty of resources. Remember he is also from the finance industry. He got https://www.eleuther.ai/ which can supply a secured, in-house custom LLM equivalent to bloombergGPT.

By promoting fully open-source AI, i.e. making datasets, models, methodology and codebases freely available and transparent. What OpenAI claimed to be aiming for, basically.

Medium models: Roughly between 1B to 10B parameters. This is where Mistral 7B, Phi-3, Gemma from Google DeepMind, and wizardlm2 sit. Fun fact: GPT 2 was a medium sized model, much smaller than its latest versions.

"Our model, called GPT-2 (a successor to GPT), was trained simply to predict the next word in 40GB of Internet text. Due to our concerns about malicious applications of the technology, we are not releasing the trained model. As an experiment in responsible disclosure, we are instead releasing a much smaller model for researchers to experiment with, as well as a technical paper. "

They did release GPT-2 under the MIT License.

Did you arrive at this certainty through reading something other than what OpenAI has published? The document [0] that describes the training data for GPT-2 makes this assertion hilarious to me.

[0]: https://github.com/openai/gpt-2/blob/master/model_card.md#da...

I made a clone of https://github.com/openai/gpt-2 on my local laptop