Consent-O-Matic
uBlock
Consent-O-Matic | uBlock | |
---|---|---|
70 | 2,992 | |
2,407 | 43,126 | |
2.3% | - | |
9.4 | 9.9 | |
13 days ago | 12 days ago | |
JavaScript | JavaScript | |
GNU General Public License v3.0 or later | GNU General Public License v3.0 only |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
Consent-O-Matic
-
The internet used to be fun
Consent-o-matic handles cookie popups. Some sites do have login-walls, enforced or no. Someone ought make another extension!
https://github.com/cavi-au/Consent-O-Matic
-
Firefox private mode now automatically blocks cookie banners for German users
Highly recommend the Consentomatic extension to automatically handle cookie prompts, too: https://github.com/cavi-au/Consent-O-Matic. One of my favourite extensions.
-
Block Cookie Banners on Firefox
See also: https://github.com/cavi-au/Consent-O-Matic
> Consent-O-Matic is a browser extension that recognizes CMP (Consent Management Provider) pop-ups. Since you've told it your cookie preferences, it will autofill those forms when it encounters them—and let you know that it did so. [Edited for brevity]
-
German court declares Do Not Track to be legally binding
I use consent-o-matic for this purpose: https://github.com/cavi-au/Consent-O-Matic
You can actually configure each toggle yourself.
- Tech workers demand high salaries despite hiring slowdown
-
New Alien movie has wrapped filming ahead of 2024 release
Here's a browser extension that automatically answers those for you
- uBlock Origin 1.50.0
-
I'm seriously so sick of the pop ups on every website I visit.
Consent-O-Matic
- Hvordan er det lovlig å påtvinge brukere usannsynlig mange slidere for å avslå datainnsamling?
- I'm so done with cookies.
uBlock
- Apr 24th is JavaScript Naked Day – Browse the web without JavaScript
- Mobile Ad Blocker Will No Longer Stop YouTube's Ads
-
Some notes on Firefox's media autoplay settings in practice as of Firefox 124
Check out uBlock Origin's per site switches [1]
[1]: https://github.com/gorhill/uBlock/wiki/Per-site-switches#no-...
-
Brave's AI assistant now integrates with PDFs and Google Drive
If ads, in particular on YouTube, are the problem, anything Chromium-based is probably only going to get worse and worse (see [1] and [2]). So that basically leaves you with Firefox and Safari.
I work for Mozilla (speaking for myself, of course), so I'll leave you to guess which I'd recommend :P
[1] https://github.com/gorhill/uBlock/wiki/uBlock-Origin-works-b...
[2] https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2023/09/googles-widely-oppos...
-
X.org Server Clears Out Remnants for Supporting Old Compilers
https://github.com/gorhill/uBlock
Or if on mobile, it is well worth it to look up adblock options for the browser you use.
-
Mozilla thinks Apple, Google, Microsoft should play fair
What are the compelling advantages of Chrome nowadays?
Chrome is working to limit the capabilities of ad blockers:
https://www.malwarebytes.com/blog/news/2023/11/chrome-pushes...
Whereas a compelling advantage of Firefox is that uBlock Origin works best in Firefox:
https://github.com/gorhill/uBlock/wiki/uBlock-Origin-works-b...
Advertising networks have often been vectors for malware. Using an ad blocker is an important security measure. Even the FBI recommends ad blockers:
https://www.malwarebytes.com/malvertising
https://theconversation.com/spyware-can-infect-your-phone-or...
https://www.ic3.gov/Media/Y2022/PSA221221?=8324278624
-
Brave Leo now uses Mixtral 8x7B as default
> It allows for 30,000 dynamic rules
That is not what we mean by dynamic filters. From https://developer.chrome.com/blog/improvements-to-content-fi...
> However, to support more frequent updates and user-defined rules, extensions can add rules dynamically too, without their developers having to upload a new version of the extension to the Chrome Web Store.
What Chrome is talking about is the ability to specify rules at runtime. What critics of Manifest V3 are talking about is not the ability to dynamically add rules (although that can be an issue), it is the ability to add dynamic rules -- ie rules that analyze and rewrite requests in the style of the blockingWebRequest permission.
It's a little deceptive to claim that the concerns here are outdated and to point to vague terminology that sounds like it's correcting the problem, but on actual inspection turns out to be entirely separate functionality from what the GP was talking about.
> Giving this ability to extensions can slow down the browser for the user. These ads can still be blocked through other means.
This is the debate; most of the adblocking community disagrees with this assertion. uBO maintains a list of some common features that are already not possible to support in Chrome ( https://github.com/gorhill/uBlock/wiki/uBlock-Origin-works-b... ) and has written about features that are not able to be supported via Chrome's current V3 API ( https://github.com/uBlockOrigin/uBOL-home/wiki/Frequently-as... ). Of particular note are filtering for large media elements (I use this a lot on mobile Firefox, it's great for reducing page size), and top-level filtering of domains/fonts.
- uBlock Origin – 1.55.0
-
In 2024, please switch to Firefox
> "Its happened before"
> That's not an argument
It's a subheading to "2. Browser engine monopoly". The subsection's purpose is describing how bad things were during the IE monopoly to reinforce that it's something to be avoided.
> in fact you could counter-argue that IE left a lot of technical debt
That would be agreeing with the article, unless I understand what you mean.
> On top of that, the internet was very different back then.
In a way that now makes it harder for truly new competing engines to pop up due to increased complexity of the web.
> I'm still not convinced, why would I change my browser?
The points made in the article are:
* Increased privacy, opposed to willingly giving your data to an ad-tech company
* Helps avoid a browser engine monopoly which would effectively let Google dictate web standards
* It’s fast and has a nice user interface
Onto which I'd add:
* Content blockers work best on Firefox (https://github.com/gorhill/uBlock/wiki/uBlock-Origin-works-b...), doubly so when Manifest V3 rolls out
* Allows more customization of interface and home page
* UX improvements, like the clutter-free reader mode, aren't vetoed to protect search revenue as with Chrome (https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37675467)
-
Ask HN: Is Firefox team too small to do serious security tests?
Advertising networks are vectors for malware:
https://www.cisecurity.org/insights/blog/malvertising
https://www.malwarebytes.com/malvertising
https://theconversation.com/spyware-can-infect-your-phone-or...
So if you're concerned about security then you want the browser with the best ad blocker.
uBlock Origin works best in Firefox:
https://github.com/gorhill/uBlock/wiki/uBlock-Origin-works-b...
What are some alternatives?
hush - 🤫 Noiseless Browsing – Content Blocker for Safari
VideoAdBlockForTwitch - Blocks Ads on Twitch.tv.
Never-Consent - Never consent to any GDPR consent management platform
Spotify-Ad-Blocker - EZBlocker - A Spotify Ad Blocker for Windows
privacybadger - Privacy Badger is a browser extension that automatically learns to block invisible trackers.
bypass-paywalls-chrome - Bypass Paywalls web browser extension for Chrome and Firefox.
uBlock-issues - This is the community-maintained issue tracker for uBlock Origin
duckduckgo-privacy-extension - DuckDuckGo Privacy Essentials browser extension for Firefox, Chrome.
I-Still-Dont-Care-About-Cookies - Debloated fork of the extension "I don't care about cookies"
ClearUrls
klaro-js - Klaro Privacy Manager. An open-source, privacy-friendly & compliant consent manager for your website.
AdNauseam - AdNauseam: Fight back against advertising surveillance