Clp
crater
Our great sponsors
Clp | crater | |
---|---|---|
2 | 23 | |
365 | 610 | |
1.4% | 2.8% | |
7.3 | 7.8 | |
9 days ago | 26 days ago | |
C++ | Rust | |
GNU General Public License v3.0 or later | - |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
Clp
-
Win32 Is the Only Stable ABI on Linux
If you want to compile a large fraction of C/C++ code, just take a distro and rebuild it from scratch--Debian actually does this reasonably frequently. All of the distros have to somehow solve the problem of figuring out how to compile and install everything they package, although some are better at letting you change the build environment for testing than others. (From what I understand, Debian and Nix are the best bets here.)
But what that doesn't solve is making sure that the resulting builds actually works. Cargo, for Rust, makes running some form of tests relatively easy, and Rust is new enough that virtually every published package is going to contain some amount of unit tests. But for random open-source packages? Not really. Pick a random numerics library--for something like an linear programming solver, this is the most comprehensive automated test suite I've seen: https://github.com/coin-or/Clp/tree/master/test
-
Linear Programming in Rust
Actually it looks like it is licensed under the EPL, not the GPL: https://github.com/coin-or/Clp/blob/master/LICENSE
crater
-
Semver violations are common, better tooling is the answer
yup, they reference it as an inspiration: https://github.com/rust-lang/crater
it's probably impossible to automate an entire ecosystem, and there is value to enabling a tighter integration within a project ecosystem (a subset of the language ecosystem).
-
Trip Summer ISO C++ standards meeting (Varna, Bulgaria)
Rather than hypothesising about an imagined tool you could look at the actual tool which of course is in Rust's source code repo: https://github.com/rust-lang/crater
> new proposed C++ changes - are checked against only easily and "well-known" accessible package.
Now that I have, so to say, shown you mine, lets see yours. Where is the tool to perform these checks in C++?
-
GCC 13 and the state of gccrs
The "break things" part of "move fast" is not essential, Rust cares so much about breakage they literally compile and run the tests for every crate on crates.io and github using a tool called Crater. They do this just to test changes, even for stuff thats documented to be unstable, because thats just courtesy. And tooling makes it trivial to switch between Rust versions.
-
Do one thing, and do it well, or not.
The bot's named Crater if you want to look into it more.
-
Improving Rust compile times to enable adoption of memory safety
See https://github.com/rust-lang/crater
-
Discussion about the state of neovim's plugin ecosystem
Rust compiler developers use a tool called Crater to test potentially breaking compiler changes on all crates (Rust's name for libraries) uploaded to the official repository. If plugin stability is the issue, maybe a solution along these lines would be better than merging these plugins to Neovim's core?
-
Experienced C++ users: what do you like about Rust? How would you sell it to other C++ users?
https://github.com/rust-lang/crater is the bot they use to test proposed compiler/stdlib changes against slices of the crates.io library up to and including "all of it".
-
Data-driven performance optimization with Rust and Miri
The tool you're referring to is called Crater: https://github.com/rust-lang/crater.
- GHC 9.4.2 regresses being able to do math on aarch64
-
Rust for Linux officially merged
I'm pretty certain this isn't actually true. You should look at the editions, etc. Rust also has an insane guarantee which I am certain C/C++ don't offer: It rebuilds its entire library ecosystem each time it ships to make sure nothing breaks (https://crater.rust-lang.org). I've never seen an instance were old code didn't compile on a new compiler. Rust isn't forwards compatible (new code compiles on an old compiler) of course, but what is?
What are some alternatives?
FluentValidation - A popular .NET validation library for building strongly-typed validation rules.
actix-net - A collection of lower-level libraries for composable network services.
AutoMapper - A convention-based object-object mapper in .NET.
rust-prehistory - historical archive of rust pre-publication development
Dapper - Dapper - a simple object mapper for .Net [Moved to: https://github.com/DapperLib/Dapper]
NUnit - NUnit Framework
apollo-client-devtools - Apollo Client browser developer tools.
rust - Empowering everyone to build reliable and efficient software.
Protobuf - Protocol Buffers - Google's data interchange format
is-odd - I created this in 2014, the year I learned how to program. All of the downloads are from an old version of https://github.com/micromatch/micromatch. I've done a few other things since: https://github.com/jonschlinkert. [Moved to: https://github.com/i-voted-for-trump/is-odd]
xUnit - xUnit.net is a free, open source, community-focused unit testing tool for .NET.
mrustc - Alternative rust compiler (re-implementation)