ClassicUO VS dynarmic

Parallels or download the client at www.classicuo.eu. With the latter option, you will need the files from the client.

The unofficial ClassicUO client runs on Macs: https://www.classicuo.eu You likely just need to provide the actual client files which could be a hassle to obtain after every patch.

If you want to play on the Classic Client I would recommend UO Classic client mod that allows the game to run at full resolution and 60FPS. https://www.classicuo.eu

Oh, in terms of emulators written in C#, never heard of Run[1]UO[2]? C# revolutionized the UO world back like 20 years ago(?) it has(d?) the right balance between simplicity, clarity and performance

[1] https://www.runuo.net/

[2] https://github.com/ClassicUO/ClassicUO

no total skills cap you'll need the client files which doesn't run on linux itself, but then you can play using ClassicUO which is linux compatible

I checked it's not on there list of servers, yet. https://www.classicuo.eu/

ClassicUO is not the official client.

This is the client we’re talking about: https://www.classicuo.eu you can boost the frames up to 60-120fps and you’re able to resize the game window to your likings.

This gonna be OT: Ciao Tommaso, after reading your project README I think you would be interested to this project too: https://github.com/ClassicUO/ClassicUO

They're probably referring to dynarmic: https://github.com/merryhime/dynarmic

As an HLE, touchHLE is radically different from a low-level emulator (LLE) like QEMU. The only code the emulated CPU executes is the app binary and a handful of libraries; touchHLE takes the place of iPhone OS and provides its own implementations of the system frameworks (Foundation, UIKit, OpenGL ES, OpenAL, etc).

https://github.com/merryhime/dynarmic/pull/697 - Dynarmic implementing Arm backend support. Dynarmic is a dynamic recompiler for ARM.

I did some work on Dynarmic, so there's my bias I guess. But I def believe Dynarmic would emit better context-aware assembly than a CIL->Native jitteror the JVM would emit. Dynarmic takes advantage of instruction sets like BMI2 and AVX{2,512} and uses a pretty darn concise intermediate representation to the original ARM assembly to emit efficient x86 while a C# JIT probably still only emits baseline x86-64 and struggles with efficient vectorization of things like Arm's NEON instructions. Can't even imagine a C# or Java VM trying to automatically emit optimal assembly for an FMADD including handling NaN propagation or detecting that FMINNM can be very quickly emulated with a single vrangep{s,d} x86 instruction.

For emulators, it's currently used in dynarmic(Yuzu's ARM-to-x86 recompiler backend) for the fast emulation of ARM's NEON instruction set.