cbl-mariner
MSEdge
Our great sponsors
| cbl-mariner | MSEdge | |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 20 | |
| 3,986 | 2,805 | |
| - | 0.7% | |
| - | 0.0 | |
| 25 days ago | 14 days ago | |
| RPM Spec | ||
| MIT License | MIT License |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
cbl-mariner
MSEdge
-
Got the invite, but chat is still not available? Any ideas?
Download Edge Dev from https://microsoftedgeinsider.com
-
Only in canonical store
Very much not open source, except maybe some pieces, the repo is just a damn readme and an MIT license (???), like "oh yeah, thanks, let me fork your readme, it's always been my dream"
-
Edge source code got removed from github?
It was never in that repository as confirmed by the commit log: https://github.com/MicrosoftEdge/MSEdge/commits/master
-
List of free open source software for windows.
No. Microsoft Edge is fully open-source: https://github.com/MicrosoftEdge. It even has an MIT license.
-
no sound
I'm distrustful of Microsoft as well. That said, Microsoft is changing and it is best to keep oneself updated on what Microsoft is saying and doing in regard to Open Source. https://github.com/MicrosoftEdge/MSEdge
- Microsoft Edge surpasses Safari as the second most popular desktop browser
-
I have no idea what I'm doing
Not exactly. Chromium, which edge is based on, itself is open source, but the microsoft browser has too much hidden tracking stuff to be open source. https://github.com/MicrosoftEdge/MSEdge
-
I'm a clown in my previous post
Just showing the github means nothing. Microsoft Edge has a github, but it just has a readme and an "MIT" license. The actual thing isn't open source.
-
Ask HN: Why are we so at the mercy of Google and Mozilla for web browsers?
> What exactly is keeping developers from making a fully featured open source web browser not at the mercy of Google or the browser's developers?
It is incredibly difficult to build a web browser because of the sheer complexity and scope. You are essentially building an entire platform on the scale of an operating system that must support legacy features and behavior from decades ago. Users expect everything to just work, and if you can't make it work, then they have little incentive to use your product. Just ask Microsoft[0].
[0] https://github.com/MicrosoftEdge/MSEdge/blob/7d69268e85e198c...
- No offence but Microsoft edge load time is faster than that of brave just by a few milliseconds
What are some alternatives?
vlmcsd-autokms - Script to automate the installation of vlmcsd as a service and therefore activate Windows :) [Moved to: https://github.com/polkaulfield/vlmcsd-autokms]
free-lunch - A curated list of free Windows software, online services and resources. Feel free to contribute!
announcements - Subscribe to this repo to be notified of Announcements and changes in .NET Core.
obs-studio - OBS Studio - Free and open source software for live streaming and screen recording
Servo - Servo, the embeddable, independent, memory-safe, modular, parallel web rendering engine
PRemoteM - Personal Remote Manager [Moved to: https://github.com/1Remote/1Remote]
browser
Visual Studio Code - Visual Studio Code
SponsorBlock - Skip YouTube video sponsors (browser extension)
calibre - The official source code repository for the calibre ebook manager
uBlock - uBlock Origin - An efficient blocker for Chromium and Firefox. Fast and lean.
chromium - The official GitHub mirror of the Chromium source