Bip39-diceware VS brute.bip39

I am talking about using diceware or Seedsigner's implementation which can even be verified independently.

Much easier, you don't have to try so many words, maximum 16 words. It's described here: https://github.com/taelfrinn/Bip39-diceware

I think it's best to create your own seed phrase, but the last word has to meet the checksum requirements ane I couldn't get it to work. Here is a tutorial but it didn't work for me - I might try again if I have the time: https://github.com/taelfrinn/Bip39-diceware

If there's concern about the RNG, you can [manually generate a key using dice](https://github.com/taelfrinn/Bip39-diceware). Real randomness! Call me paranoid, but IMO it's worth the extra 30 minutes or whatever. One less thing to trust.

You can use the BIP 39 word list along with dice and a coin to select 23 random words, then use a bip39 brute force tool to find the last word. If you use this method, you'll follow up with Ian Coleman's tool to get the actual private keys and addresses.