Bip39-diceware VS Wallets Recovery

I am talking about using diceware or Seedsigner's implementation which can even be verified independently.

Much easier, you don't have to try so many words, maximum 16 words. It's described here: https://github.com/taelfrinn/Bip39-diceware

I think it's best to create your own seed phrase, but the last word has to meet the checksum requirements ane I couldn't get it to work. Here is a tutorial but it didn't work for me - I might try again if I have the time: https://github.com/taelfrinn/Bip39-diceware

If there's concern about the RNG, you can [manually generate a key using dice](https://github.com/taelfrinn/Bip39-diceware). Real randomness! Call me paranoid, but IMO it's worth the extra 30 minutes or whatever. One less thing to trust.

It works when it works, and sometimes not https://walletsrecovery.org/

I dojt know what this is for, if its technical or not. Maybe ask a language ai model to elabotate some stuff. If walletsrecovery.org

https://walletsrecovery.org look for list of wallets that support BIP-39.

Yesn't In addition to your seed phrase, you need the script type and derivation path (assuming you're not backing up from the wallet you generated the seed from) https://walletsrecovery.org/ <-literally just a list of derivation paths per wallet

You can find your derivation path here: https://walletsrecovery.org/

See https://walletsrecovery.org/ for a partial survey of compatibility and incompatibility

You can check which derivation path your wallet uses here: https://walletsrecovery.org (this is literally just a list of derivation paths)

https://walletsrecovery.org check this