BaGet VS checkmk

As others have mentioned, you want NuGet. However, beyond the directory approach that was already mentioned, people may be interested to know that you can also do a web hosted version or if you prefer you can use the full NuGet Gallery project that powers nuget.org. At this point there's like 20 different ways to do it now. Hanselman had a list of some options a while back. BaGet is kind of interesting on that list.

Yeah I know all this, you can even use BaGet[1] symbol server to cache or manage private dependencies in an enterprise network. That is not the point... I think that the most used tool / platform should provide more flexibility for non-enterprise or less expierienced developers.

No offense, I like nuget, but I recently made a typo and checked in 0.0.23 instead of 0.0.2. Now, everytime I add a dependency that is < 0.0.23 to a project, that has not been synchronized / validated yet (the other problem I described), it automatically takes the best match, which is 0.0.23 assuming to be the newest package, even if unlisted.

I also burned a 1.0.0 because of a failing script like that... not really bad, but annoying...

https://github.com/loic-sharma/BaGet

You could try self hosting a baget instance, it supports read through caching too (probably all the custom nuget servers do) https://github.com/loic-sharma/BaGet

I was able to get Baget installed and configured as an Azure Container Instance.

NuGet server - BaGet (https://github.com/loic-sharma/BaGet)

I created another CI, for Baget, which also uses sqlite. It has a similar problem with file locking:

Or Checkmk [1], which is coming from Nagios and brings thousands of plugins for nearly every hardware and service you can think of..

[1] https://checkmk.com/

CheckMK - GitHub

CheckMK https://checkmk.com. You can spin this up in a docker container

I use CheckMK to do all of this and more, except nutanix. But checkmk also can Monitor nutanix via the "Nutanix Prism" special agent Integration

BI machine and NVR report to CheckMK Raw host so it's easy to see historic stats.

I’m using https://checkmk.com/ to monitor stuff and it seems to work great. Lots of built in features and functions and if they don’t have what you need you can also create custom scripts to check and report on anything you can dream up. Runs great in docker (I’m using portainer but will run fine in plain old docker).

Have a look at CheckMK open source version is really good, you can spin it up in a docker container and is relatively easy to get some initial monitors going. As to whether it's worthwhile, I guess it depends how much you want to know how you servers are doing and when something goes wrong.

Checkmk

checkmk: https://checkmk.com/