BaGet VS checkmk

As others have mentioned, you want NuGet. However, beyond the directory approach that was already mentioned, people may be interested to know that you can also do a web hosted version or if you prefer you can use the full NuGet Gallery project that powers nuget.org. At this point there's like 20 different ways to do it now. Hanselman had a list of some options a while back. BaGet is kind of interesting on that list.

Yeah I know all this, you can even use BaGet[1] symbol server to cache or manage private dependencies in an enterprise network. That is not the point... I think that the most used tool / platform should provide more flexibility for non-enterprise or less expierienced developers.

No offense, I like nuget, but I recently made a typo and checked in 0.0.23 instead of 0.0.2. Now, everytime I add a dependency that is < 0.0.23 to a project, that has not been synchronized / validated yet (the other problem I described), it automatically takes the best match, which is 0.0.23 assuming to be the newest package, even if unlisted.

I also burned a 1.0.0 because of a failing script like that... not really bad, but annoying...

https://github.com/loic-sharma/BaGet

NuGet server - BaGet (https://github.com/loic-sharma/BaGet)

checkmk: https://checkmk.com/

Checkmk I have use the "raw" (free) version and we now use the enterprise version. Both are very capable.

For some time, my primary choice is checkmk because:

Most web UIs don't provide this, though there are specialized ones that do. For example scrutiny for drive health. There are also dashboards for this like Uptime Kuma, zabbix, and checkmk

BI machine and NVR report to CheckMK Raw host so it's easy to see historic stats.

If you already have some form of infrastructure and application monitoring solution, you could monitor data (job status, job duration, etc.) from the key jobs in your existing infrastructure and application monitoring solution. Splunk, Datadog, and several others have existing integrations to Jenkins. I've used the open source https://checkmk.com/ in the past. I'm confident that others have used Zabbix or similar open source monitoring tools

I tried few monitoring systems from PRTG, TIG, Observium, even Uptime Kuma. I end up with checkmk. It's not easy to set up, but once you understand how to do it, things are getting simple. It presents very in-depth information, and helped me find issues I've never expected (e.g. network interface errors in VM because of wrong driver). It's build on Bash + Python, so writing the own modules or adjusting agent code is easy as pie. The program stores data in RRD - it doesn't consume your disk during time.

It's better to use a system like CheckMK (a German company) to monitor and a dashboard to get to your app. The free edition has all the main features, is not limited, and it's really easy to setup with docker.. You can setup multiple dashboards so different users can monitor custom areas

Depends on which dockers. I tried running a docker instance of CheckMk on an LXC and the outgoing networking stuff didn't work right.

This is a great tool though probably overkill for your needs https://checkmk.com/